I don’t think humanity is going to continue to agree to what is government approved torturing of people who have already undergone trauma. I don’t think humanity wants to be inhumane. So eventually those people who have altered states of consciousness and unusual sensory experiences won’t be subjected to a forced psychiatric regime, by the fearful public, who if they were better would never approve of such things as ECT and forced drugging.
Saturday, May 10, 2014
Saturday, May 3, 2014
More than 24 million people abused, worldwide, by medical practitioners
24
million people worldwide, that’s more than 22.68 million, which is the
population of Australia. So, more people than the population of Australia are
forcefully injected with neuroleptics, by psychiatrists world-wide, horrible
dangerous substances, that were torturous to me, are put into their bloodstream.
That’s not a tiny amount of people.
What’s contained in
neuroleptics?
MUCH DISCOMFORT, DAMAGE,
AND WRECKING OF HUMAN-LIFE
The petroleum based chemicals is contained in all neuroleptics:
Propylene glycol (pharmaceutical grade anti-freeze)
is highly toxic to have in the body every second of your life. It’s not okay
for more than 24 million people to be injected with this stuff against their
will. It’s not even okay to market this stuff as a product. FDA is really negligent.
Another version of this:
‘Hydroxypropyl
cellulose ‘an ether of cellulose in which some of the hydroxyl groups in the
repeating glucose units have been hydroxypropylated using propylene oxide’
(Wikapedia.)
Basically, dancing to the same tune as Propylene glycol,
which I’m definitely allergic to. There are many, many other awful chemicals
here too beside the antifreeze derivatives: lactose, maize starch,
microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate, plenty of GMO products etc…
Psychiatrists have given me a healthy disrespect
for medical practitioners in general. I see doctors for the sales people they
are. They’re unethical and break their own codes on a regular basis. ‘Do no
harm’ is their first up, and they harm so much more than any other profession
on earth. GPs have never helped me, but have often hindered me, by thinking
they’re right and stopping me from getting x-rays that I then get later,
revealing bones healed crookedly. The latest was a GP who though he could
arrogantly assert that an allergy doesn’t happen with enlargements of lymph
nodes and that I needed anti-biotics. Doctors are into the ANTI marketing: anti-psychotics,
anti-depressives… twits.
The Australian government is reducing its
funding of doctors. While I empathise with those who want appointments with
doctors, I can’t help but think, good, I don’t want medical doctors to be
funded, I think they’re pretty useless and destructive and I’d rather have
other sectors of the community funded. Dentists aren’t funded. I’ve found
dentists far more useful than GPs and psychiatrists. Psychologists aren’t
funded, Art Therapists aren’t funded. Artists aren’t funded.
Oh, and if I have another workplace boss
that tells me I need to go to a GP to get a medical certificate for a migraine,
to take the day of, which is impossible, because I wouldn’t make it to the GP
without my entire body shutting down, I just think: don’t. If you don’t trust
your employees, you shouldn’t be employing them. Besides, there’s only a
certain number of days that can be taken off, with pay, if any.
So, over 24 million people are told they are ‘psychotic’
in their expression and get labelled 'schizophrenic' and other such and such million 'bipolar' another such and such million yep... People are being vilified and not allowed to tell their story
through any means. They are denied validation, told they are sick and then
tortured for being incomprehensible, then compared to murderers and violent criminals, who are the only people that find psychiatry helpful, in that it means they don't have to go to court for the crime they committed. Nice world we live in thanks to modern
medicine.
Toxic psychiatry indeed: http://www.toxicpsychiatry.com/
Friday, May 2, 2014
What do neuroleptics, cigarette smoke, some wines, and dental anaesthetics have in common? Propylene glycol
I'm thinking that propylene
glycol might be a huge culprit for me, allergy wise. Second-hand smoke from
normal tobacco,
also e-cigs,
theatre smoke, nasty effects to my body, itching, swelling, immune system goes berserk.
Some wines, that had propylene glycol used as a cooling agent, particularly
reds, nasty for me, lymph swellings. Also, dental injections, (Inferior
alveolar nerve anaesthesia) that GPs can also give in the arm for a skin sample,
have propylene
glycol in them, do nasty reactions like heavy nose bleeds. I use organic
skin/ hair products these days for obvious reasons. Neuroleptics... very nasty
reactions on my body, including hair loss. All neuroleptics seem to have propylene
glycol in them. I’m not saying it’s the only product in neuroleptics that is
harmful, however…
It should be mandatory for all people to be tested for propylene
glycol allergy, before they are forcefully drugged by psychiatrists. It is far
worse to be forced to take neuroleptic tablets on a daily basis, forced, because
otherwise you’ll injected with long acting neuroleptics that also contain propylene
glycol. The neuroleptics are in the body all the time, meant to be, according to
psychiatrists.
Escaping red wine, cigarette users and dental numbing is far
easier than escaping psychiatrists who burst into your living space unwelcomed
and unwanted, and forcefully drag you off so they can get propylene glycol into
you, in sickly high doses.
Yep. I think if people tested for propylene
glycol allergy, those people couldn’t easily be injected with neuroleptics,
if they’ve written it into an Advanced Statement. Fear of malpractice suits being
launched might prevail. Just thinking of ways…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)