I don’t think humanity is going to continue to agree to what is government approved torturing of people who have already undergone trauma. I don’t think humanity wants to be inhumane. So eventually those people who have altered states of consciousness and unusual sensory experiences won’t be subjected to a forced psychiatric regime, by the fearful public, who if they were better would never approve of such things as ECT and forced drugging.
Showing posts with label Royal Melbourne John Cade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Royal Melbourne John Cade. Show all posts
while Fiona Smith has got free from arbitrary detention in Royal Melbourne John Cade, (yesterday afternoon) she is still being forcibly subjected to Rispiridone Long Acting Injection (RLAI).
What lucrative research is Fiona Smith being exploited for?
Protest on Wednesday, 23rd Oct at Royal Melbourne John Cade
for Fiona Smith and the #Right2Refuse, coinciding with the Mental Health Tribunal to stop the CTO on Fiona Smith, located in this building.
Compliance with torturous drugs, is about indoctrinating a person into denial
Mental Health Tribunal Administration, and Royal Melbourne John Cade, must not act as an assessor of #compliance to RLAI and other drugs being forced, as if that's a point of law, it isn't, it's their research agenda, that should NOT be allowed, most especially given the horrific allergic reactions Fiona Smith is suffering as a result of RLAI, that are life threatening and life destroying. To force this drug on Fiona cannot be considered medicine, it is the opposite of medicine - a clear violation, chemical assault.
The #right2refuse is a political point-of-view
How can Mental Health Tribunal Administration, and Royal Melbourne John Cade, even think of medicalising a political point-of-view, well-recognised world-wide in the human rights movement - that of demanding the #right2refuse RLAI and other psychdrugs, products, procedures and programs - most especially given that Fiona Smith has been protesting for years on this issue? It is unconstitutional to deny a political point-of-view and medicalise it, and subject the person with that political point-of-view to known neurotoxins, to shut them down, silence them, and break them into compliance with another point-of-view. It is dictatorial. It is also a clear violation of ethics, neuroleptics are considered one of the worst tortures in the world, that cause such horrific damage to a person's physical health.
The aim, for Fiona Smith, is to have the RLAI stopped immediately so that Fiona Smith doesn't have to suffer this further, the harmful and potentially lethal effects of this drug, and reduce the Rispiridone tablets gradually in a harm reduction method with a supportive GP.
Action is needed urgently on Fiona Smith's #right2refuse. Share, write blogs, letters of support, be there to protest on Wednesday if you can. Also do sign this petition - http://chng.it/SSzBQmrCcD
Forced Rispirdal/ Respiradone Consta is not a ‘least restrictive measure’, not supportive, or necessary, rather it is dangerously harmful and a huge risk to Fiona Smith’s health, well-being and life.
Fiona Smith does NOT consent to be in human research trial ACTRN12609000317291, which includes Risperadal Consta injections. She does NOT consent to this injection being used on her for 3 times for 6 weeks prior to enrollment in trial ACTRN12609000317291, or any other research that involves this drug.
Such research without consent, is a violation of the Federal Responsible Research Code 8.2, for harm caused to Fiona Smith et al & 8.3 for the river life harmed by excess of synthetic toxins that cannot be removed from waste water.
Fiona Smith cannot be said to fall into the category of ‘emergency’ and to do so is a perverse corrupt use of emergency powers.
It is unclear what Dr Tiggy means by ‘psychosis’, it seems nebulous, and slanderous. And indeed what the crime of psychosis could possibly be that must be so harshly punished with arbitrary detention and neurotoxins known to cause intellectual and physical retardation, dis-figuration of attractiveness, and rapid deterioration of bodily organs (especially dangerous to people over 45.)
Fiona has committed NO CRIME. The medicalisation, slander of Fiona Smith by Mental Health Personnel and discrimination on the basis of disability is the crime here. Fiona Smith is a Victim of Psychiatrists, and should be allowed the right to refuse psychiatrists' products, procedures, programs and their bloody beds!
Fiona Smith has been sending email petitions for the purpose of awareness campaigning. She is alleging serious abuse, neglect and violence from Mental Health personnel towards persons with disabilities. She should be redirected to report to the correct channels, should anyone find her emails not something they can act on, channels such as the Federal Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse and Neglect of Persons with Disabilities, should be an obvious redirection. Why was that so difficult for Mental Health personnel to accomplish? This simple redirection and support of much needed reporting of these serious crimes. Instead they want to shut Fiona Smith up? Torture her with forced drugging and detain her, to break her under torture.
Fiona Smith has been having serious reactions to Rispiradone/ Risperdal for some time, which is increasing in severity. Recogising that the drug was causing her adverse reactions, she sought out a GP to safely withdraw from this drug. Fiona should not be condemned for doing this, she certainly shouldn’t be condemned for suffering withdrawal symptoms and feeling outrage at those who have forced these drugs into her body (and have profited in the course of their work from doing so), while Fiona has suffered massive damage to her life and livelihood from having this and other neurotoxins forced on her.
Fiona should be allowed the right to withdraw from these neurotoxins (Risperidone/ Respirdal) and not be labelled with vicious slurs as a result of withdrawal symptoms.
Fiona is an engaging and intelligent woman who speaks the truth. Support from lawyers into clarifying that truths she writes and speaks of, into that which is suitable to a court of law, is the support Fiona Smith needs, not further exploitation from Mental Health Personnel, who need to be prosecuted.
Arbitrary detention and inflicting medical research on a person on the basis of accused disability MUST be considered abhorrent for very obvious ethical reasons.
Please urge Royal Melbourne John Cade to release Fiona Smith, and stop forcing Risperdal/ Risperdone Consta injections. Demand Fiona Smith be immediately released from arbitrary detention at Royal Melbourne John Cade and permitted to choose a medical practitioner that supports her in withdrawing from these neurotoxins that Royal Melbourne John Cade Mental Health Personnel have forced into her body putting her life in danger. Fiona Smith must also have the right to refuse a medical practitioner that doesn’t suit her.
Fiona Smith also has duties concerning animal welfare, and needs to return to her flat ASAP to look after her cat.
There must be no more harassment at Fiona Smith’s flat, by Mental Health Personnel, who insist on maintaining her as a cash-cow tied to their services, products, procedures, research and programs, that she does not want to participate in. To bundle housing into a coercive-control as well as forced psychiatry and forced human research is just hideously unethical and not socially supportive at all, rather corrupt and violating.
Fiona Smith must be permitted to disengage from people who she does not want in her life. She should not have to fear that another person, whom she does not trust, has the key to her home.
Harassment and threats to animal life must be taken seriously by housing providers and stopped. A grievance this serious must be investigated. The person who reports (the harassment, and threats to animal life) such as Fiona Smith did, should not be then silenced by forced psychiatry, such as Fiona Smith has been. This victim-blaming is lazy and cruel for a housing provider.
A person who has information on the violence, abuse and neglect in the Mental Health System, should be supported in reporting through correct channels, such as the Federal Royal Commission; rather than left to despair that no one will do anything to stop the violence, abuse and neglect of persons with disabilities.
This is not about what psychiatrists accuse Fiona Smith of, this is about what Fiona accuses the treating and consultant psychiatrists of, and whether those psychiatrists need to be jailed for their violations of Fiona Smith. It is the supervising, researching, treating and consultant psychiatrists and the other Mental Health Personnel involved, that have committed a violent crime against Fiona Smith, and there is no accusation which makes their violations of her body, for their profit, a lawful ethical thing to do.
