ATTACK ON FIONA BY MELBOURNE HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY

Please sign Fiona Smith's petition to Royal Melbourne John Cade & human researchers, that need to immediately release Fiona, and stop forcibly injecting, stop harassing her.https://www.change.org/p/the-royal-melbourne-hospital-john-cade-adult-acute-inpatient-unit-level-1-fiona-smith-demands-the-right2refuse-psychiatrists-products-procedures-programs-beds

Fiona Smith, platypus advocate and #Right2Refuse protester was about to head up to the 10th Oct rally in Canberra, for VOP day, but instead is being arbitrarily detained & tortured at Royal Melbourne John Cade, forcibly, likely prepping her for human research involving forced Risperdal Consta injections. These injections could prove lethal, as Fiona Smith is having severe allergic reactions to Risperdal/ Respiradone Consta, that Janssen-Cilag warn about on their website.

Forced Rispirdal/ Respiradone Consta is not a ‘least restrictive measure’, not supportive, or necessary, rather it is dangerously harmful and a huge risk to Fiona Smith’s health, well-being and life. 

Fiona Smith does NOT consent to be in human research trial ACTRN12609000317291, which includes Risperadal Consta injections. She does NOT consent to this injection being used on her for 3 times for 6 weeks prior to enrollment in trial ACTRN12609000317291, or any other research that involves this drug.

Such research without consent, is a violation of the Federal Responsible Research Code 8.2, for harm caused to Fiona Smith et al & 8.3 for the river life harmed by excess of synthetic toxins that cannot be removed from waste water.

Fiona Smith cannot be said to fall into the category of ‘emergency’ and to do so is a perverse corrupt use of emergency powers.

It is unclear what Dr Tiggy means by ‘psychosis’, it seems nebulous, and slanderous. And indeed what the crime of psychosis could possibly be that must be so harshly punished with arbitrary detention and neurotoxins known to cause intellectual and physical retardation, dis-figuration of attractiveness, and rapid deterioration of bodily organs (especially dangerous to people over 45.)

Fiona has committed NO CRIME. The medicalisation, slander of Fiona Smith by Mental Health Personnel and discrimination on the basis of disability is the crime here. Fiona Smith is a Victim of Psychiatrists, and should be allowed the right to refuse psychiatrists' products, procedures, programs and their bloody beds!

Fiona Smith has been sending email petitions for the purpose of awareness campaigning. She is alleging serious abuse, neglect and violence from Mental Health personnel towards persons with disabilities. She should be redirected to report to the correct channels, should anyone find her emails not something they can act on, channels such as the Federal Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse and Neglect of Persons with Disabilities, should be an obvious redirection. Why was that so difficult for Mental Health personnel to accomplish? This simple redirection and support of much needed reporting of these serious crimes. Instead they want to shut Fiona Smith up? Torture her with forced drugging and detain her, to break her under torture.

Fiona Smith has been having serious reactions to Rispiradone/ Risperdal for some time, which is increasing in severity. Recogising that the drug was causing her adverse reactions, she sought out a GP to safely withdraw from this drug. Fiona should not be condemned for doing this, she certainly shouldn’t be condemned for suffering withdrawal symptoms and feeling outrage at those who have forced these drugs into her body (and have profited in the course of their work from doing so), while Fiona has suffered massive damage to her life and livelihood from having this and other neurotoxins forced on her.

Fiona should be allowed the right to withdraw from these neurotoxins (Risperidone/ Respirdal) and not be labelled with vicious slurs as a result of withdrawal symptoms.

Fiona is an engaging and intelligent woman who speaks the truth. Support from lawyers into clarifying that truths she writes and speaks of, into that which is suitable to a court of law, is the support Fiona Smith needs, not further exploitation from Mental Health Personnel, who need to be prosecuted.

Fiona Smith is an active protester, UN Reporter and petitioner in the legitimate right to refuse forced psychiatry and forced human research, a right that is supported by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Arbitrary detention and inflicting medical research on a person on the basis of accused disability MUST be considered abhorrent for very obvious ethical reasons.

Please urge Royal Melbourne John Cade to release Fiona Smith, and stop forcing Risperdal/ Risperdone Consta injections. Demand Fiona Smith be immediately released from arbitrary detention at Royal Melbourne John Cade and permitted to choose a medical practitioner that supports her in withdrawing from these neurotoxins that Royal Melbourne John Cade Mental Health Personnel have forced into her body putting her life in danger. Fiona Smith must also have the right to refuse a medical practitioner that doesn’t suit her.

Fiona Smith also has duties concerning animal welfare, and needs to return to her flat ASAP to look after her cat.

There must be no more harassment at Fiona Smith’s flat, by Mental Health Personnel, who insist on maintaining her as a cash-cow tied to their services, products, procedures, research and programs, that she does not want to participate in. To bundle housing into a coercive-control as well as forced psychiatry and forced human research is just hideously unethical and not socially supportive at all, rather corrupt and violating.

Fiona Smith must be permitted to disengage from people who she does not want in her life. She should not have to fear that another person, whom she does not trust, has the key to her home.

Harassment and threats to animal life must be taken seriously by housing providers and stopped. A grievance this serious must be investigated. The person who reports (the harassment, and threats to animal life) such as Fiona Smith did, should not be then silenced by forced psychiatry, such as Fiona Smith has been. This victim-blaming is lazy and cruel for a housing provider.

A person who has information on the violence, abuse and neglect in the Mental Health System, should be supported in reporting through correct channels, such as the Federal Royal Commission; rather than left to despair that no one will do anything to stop the violence, abuse and neglect of persons with disabilities.

This is not about what psychiatrists accuse Fiona Smith of, this is about what Fiona accuses the treating and consultant psychiatrists of, and whether those psychiatrists need to be jailed for their violations of Fiona Smith. It is the supervising, researching, treating and consultant psychiatrists and the other Mental Health Personnel involved, that have committed a violent crime against Fiona Smith, and there is no accusation which makes their violations of her body, for their profit, a lawful ethical thing to do.

Poisoned person does unconscionable crimes

The way the public sees all Compulsory Patients, is in the manner of the way this 20-year-old man is described as having done unconscionable crimes. As not having the capacity to stand trial and therefore being subjected to a Public Health Order, for his crime.

Given the man was marginalised and exploited by psychiatrists, has committed horrific violence, he should be held accountable for his crimes, instead he’s being denied capacity to stand trial. There should be Equality before the Law. That the grandparents were potentially going to call the Crisis Assessment Treatment Team on him and have him made a Compulsory Patient, is likely. So, instead of being totally disempowered by others, he attacked and had power over others’ lives, however fleetingly.

Most people who are sectioned as Compulsory Patients, don’t commit unconscionable crimes, or any crime at all, they usually haven’t ever had power over anyone, and experience horrific violence at the hands of community and the psychiatrists who have legislative power to make them Compulsory Patients.

No one should be subjected to forced psychiatry, it is unlawful that Australia forces chemicals and procedures on anyone. Detention should not be arbitrary, yet this unlawful legislation is what is written into every State/ Territory.

Under the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 –  

"compulsory patient" means a person who is subject to—

        (a)     an Assessment Order; or

        (b)     a Court Assessment Order; or

        (c)     a Temporary Treatment Order; or

        (d)     a Treatment Order;

"consent", in relation to health information, has the same meaning as it has in section 3(1) of the Health Records Act 2001 ;

There are people who are Compulsory Patients that have done nothing more than cry in the corner and refuse to go with a psychiatrist. Then there are people that have committed offenses that wouldn’t normally result in a jail term. Then, rarely, there are people that do what the 20-year old described in the News Daily article did, something unconscionable and violent. What is common to all the people who are Compulsory Patients – is that they do not want psychiatrists treating them, because what psychiatrists do to people is one of the most unconscionable crimes in the world – forcibly experimenting on humans with cruel, inhuman, degrading intrusive chemicals, procedures that maim and kill them.

Forced neuroleptics cause distress; these drugs are dangerous, they cause people to be upset and angry. Neuroleptics are horrible poisons, with the most horrible effects. No one chooses to take neuroleptics, because they don’t help with anything, they destroy ability, livelihood, and health.

A person’s life to end up being that of a laboratory specimen, and the governing State, enforcing this with a Public Health Order, usually in the form of a Mental Health Act – is devastating. Being tortured makes anyone angry, upset, disabled… these forced treatments cause a massive death rate each year. They do not ‘alleviate suffering’.

When a person stops taking the neuroleptics, depending if pills or depot (the depot stays in the body for another 9 months at least, it is a long acting neuroleptic), the withdrawal from the drug means the person’s nervous system becomes free from being shut down. The bodily compensation or attempts to combat the neurotoxin may continue to operate, and that will mean a period of adjustment, where a person usually needs support in reminding them they’re withdrawing.

Emotionally, one thing a person or animal does when free from torture, is want to stop ever being tortured again, and understandably does not want to be threatened with torture again, does want to do everything possible to stop being tortured again. Neuroleptics are a horrific torture. How does one stop a government legislating such a torture? How does one stop friends and family from dobbing them into the torturers?

We live in a society gone wrong. A society that places torturing psychiatrists on a wage higher than nearly anyone else in the country. A society that allows for legislation that forcibly exploits people for vile, cruel human experimentation, of which psychiatrists and a coterie of investors profit, while the people forcibly exploited under Public Health Orders, are used like animals are in laboratories, as a piece of laboratory equipment, their human voice silenced, as though the person were not able to communicate, their autonomy taken away, their body violently assaulted. Yet they’re not even able to say this is assault and battery, if they do, higher doses and other painful procedures, isolation, deprivation is inflicted. If the person is not a forensic patient, they are arbitrarily detained and tortured until they submit to all the psychiatrist demands, even though the reality is that the treatments don’t assist in any way with anything but the psychiatrists’ funding, that the treatments cause horrific suffering and damage to the person is well known, by those who have been behind these whitecoat closed-doors.

The UN CRPD committee has asked Australia to end forced psychiatry, and remove the legislation that commits this violation.

Yet State/ Territories have done nothing to remove forced psychiatry from their legislation. They have increased their human research budget, and even paid for propaganda to make it look like all human research is voluntary and helpful.

What psychiatrists do is bloody murder.

Is the psychiatrist going to be held to account though? For causing a person such distress? No, because there’s a get-out-of-jail-free clause written into the legislation for the authorised – treating psychiatrist.

In Good Faith rule

77           Urgent medical treatment

s. 77

                (1)           A health practitioner may perform medical treatment on a patient without obtaining the informed consent of the patient or a person specified in section 75 if the health practitioner is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the medical treatment is necessary, as a matter of urgency—

                (a)           to save the patient's life; or

                (b)           to prevent serious damage to the patient's health; or

                (c)           to prevent the patient from suffering or continuing to suffer significant pain or distress.

                (2)           A health practitioner who, in good faith, carries out, or supervises the carrying out, of medical treatment in the belief on reasonable grounds that the requirements of this section have been complied with is not—

                (a)           guilty of assault or battery; or

                (b)           guilty of professional misconduct or unprofessional conduct; or

                (c)           liable in any civil proceedings for assault or battery.

                (3)           Nothing in this section affects any duty of care owed by a health practitioner to a patient.

&

231         Protection from liability

                (1)           The Commissioner is not personally liable for any thing done or omitted to be done in good faith—

                (a)           in the exercise of a power or the performance of a function under this Act; or

                (b)           in the reasonable belief that the act or omission was in the exercise of a power or the performance of a function under this Act.

                (2)           Any liability resulting from an act or omission that, but for subsection (1), would attach to the Commissioner attaches instead to the State.

Is the body corporate (the Crown, in this case NSW) going to be held accountable for legislating the poisoning and desperation of this man persecuted by psychiatrists and his community through legislation – that caused him to be so desperate he decided that if everyone was going to endorse the harming of him, he was going to harm them back?

References

·         News Daily https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/state/nsw/2018/06/02/man-allegedly-kills-grandmother-bega/?utm_source=Adestra&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Sunday%20Best%2020180603

·         Victorian Mental Health Act 2014

Mental Health objectives & principals for procuring human research specimens

Legislation that declares ‘To provide’ for:

• Unlawful forced assessment and forced treatment
• Least obstructive to the human researchers possible, with the least possible exposure of restrictions on human rights and human dignity
• To protect whitecoat vested interests in human research, enable and support psychiatrists:
• to make, or participate in, decisions about their assessment, treatment and recovery of funds; and
• to exercise their rights under this Act
• to provide oversight and safeguards in relation to the assessment of persons who appear to be procurable for human research specimens
• to promote the recovery of funds for research specimen treatment regimes
• to ensure that persons who are assessed and treated under this Act are informed of their need to submit to treatments without resistance under this Act;
• to indoctrinate the role of carers in reinforcing the assessment, treatment and fundraising for human research.

Such is the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 - unlawful statute law, made by parliament, it can be repealed by parliament. Recognise the violence under this legislation that, calls deliberate poisoning, causing of lesions and seizures to be 'treatment'. 

According to the misogynist MP Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt, repealing this legislation must be done by the State of Victoria.

'Under the Australian Constitution, state governments are responsible for the delivery of specialised public mental health services in Australia. Each state and territory has developed its own legislation on how to ensure the safety and welfare of people with mental illness, including the use of involuntary assessment and treatment. While the Commonwealth continues have an active interest in this area it cannot intervene in state legislation on mental health.' 

Please work towards getting this legislation that provides for forced psychiatry to be abolished. Make your own petition and sign current Victorian e-petitions 63 & 67.