Janita needs freedom from forced neurotoxin

'I don't want anyone else to suffer the way I have. I don't want forced psychiatry and forced psychiatric treatments in psychwards,' Janita Thurston.
Please sign Janita's petition for freedom from forcibly injected neurotoxins AND her other petition to reform the South Australian Mental Health Act, so that it doesn't include forced psychiatry.

Janita Thurston is well-aware of the devastating effects that forced psychiatric drugs have on her life, and yet she is being denied her autonomy, said not to have the capacity to understand the perpetrating psychiatrists’ point-of-view. Why should she understand and be obedient to perpetrators? She has been fully aware since psychiatrists first harmed her while she was still in secondary school, that psychiatrists were harming her and they are. Since 2002, various psychiatrists have tested out their products on her, naming the harms of the neurotoxins they forced on her as ‘a disease’ instead of recognising what psychiatrists know is one of the many horrible effects of neuroleptics.

Janita Thurston has been asking for 18 years, for the right to refuse psychiatrists torturous products, procedures, programs… yet has been continuously used by psychiatrists for various disgusting cruel human research studies.
This is likely to be the current research Janita Thurston is being used for, without permission, without her knowledge –
2016-2020 Project Grant; $626,179
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHRMC), Australia: 1102628
Morgan, V., McGrath, J., Galletly, C., Harvey, C., Castle, D., Cohen, M., Jablensky, A., Carr, V., Neil, A., Wattereus, A
Title: “An empirical framework for assessing mortality and morbidity in people with psychotic disorders: 7-year prospective and 10-year retrospective follow-up of 2075 participants in the Survey of High Impact Psychosis (SHIP) using linked registers”

What can a person do to escape a violent cruel regime such as forced psychiatry is? Victims of psychiatrists are not even permitted the right to self-defence.

If the history and current violations of psychiatrists on Janita Thurston were made into a movie – you would truly recognise her as the heroic protagonist, against the vile, cruel government legislated regime that is the mental health system in South Australia.

Janita advocates on behalf of animals and wants the right to boycott animal cruelty
Janita is aware of the horrific animal cruelty that pharmaceutical companies inflict on those animals they test these products on. Janita wants the right to refuse these products on that basis, and the basis of her right as a vegan, as well as reasons of her own right to life, right to health, and right to freedom from torture...

Please sign Janita's petition for freedom from forcibly injected neurotoxins AND her other petition to reform the South Australian Mental Health Act, so that it doesn't include forced psychiatry.

VOP for International Women's Day

For Government to legislate for psy to conduct perverted experiments on women in order to make them more pliable to other kinds of predators – how can that be justified in a democratic country? It is a vile, cruel dictatorship that allows psy to perpetrate upon vulnerable women.


How is it that torture of a woman can be called ‘care’? The violation of a woman for the purposes of perverted medical experimentation is evil, and to legislate that is evil dictatorship, encroaching on a young woman’s right to refuse the penetration of her body. And for psy to ‘plan’ to do this violation to a  woman is utterly obscene.


To restrict a  woman’s life to that of serving her exploiters as a laboratory specimen, is a heinous crime – and for a government to legislate this heinous crime as legitimate by naming it ‘medicine’ is the most soul-destroying, life-wrecking regime to live under, for the women subjected to this. Her right to life, family, love, her health – being massacred. what does she have to celebrate unless society starts to do something to get the government to stop violating her? Without people to be there with her, doing that with her, she’s ganged up on by the psy and the government that allows it.


To legislate for psy’s treatment of a woman, based on psy’s slander of a person, so that psy can profit out of VOP flesh, is not lawful legislation.


To legislate for the use of police officers to force a woman into a psy’s bed, where she is then stripped and penetrated, injected with neurotoxins that torture her – cause physical pain and mental anguish, diminish physical and mental capacities, and are designed to disrupt profoundly her senses and personality… is not lawful legislation. And is a vile misuse of emergency powers. To call an organisation that inflicts such torture ‘the department of health and wellbeing’ – another insult to the physical realities, and gaslighting of her world.

It is never correct or preferable for a court of law to decide to allow a psy to torture a women.

The calling of a woman’s decision-making ‘impaired’ when she refuses to be forcibly penetrated by a psy, refuses to swallow a psy’s neurotoxin, is an extremely corrupt, violent use of medicalisation on a woman’s social and political rights – particularly the right to refuse exploitation, violation, and condemnation. The right to refuse the harm that psy inflicts on her, the right to speak out against the slander psy insults her with, the right to ask to seek justice… The politics of being antipsychiatry and the right to refuse psy – that should be a human right in any democratic court of law.


It is disgustingly inappropriate to legislate for the violation of a  woman, by injecting her forcibly with neurotoxins, destroying her hopes and dreams of living without the persecution of psy.

What a cost to her humanity! To her dignity! To her health! To her viability! To her fertility and creative spirit! To enslave women for the purposes of psy’s vile, cruel human research and do this through a court of law, a court that declares itself not to be an adversarial hearing but rather an inquisitorial one, that doesn’t have to prove fact or evidence! No rules of evidence in a Mental Health Tribunal – the psy can say whatever they want about the women they’re persecuting, and the psy’s wants and needs to exploit her, will be routinely rubber stamped! (In normal jurisdictions Courts and Tribunals are a purely adversarial hearing).


There is no place for inflicting torture on a woman, there’s no excuse as a matter of National Security, and even if it were for the purposes of National Security (which psy isn’t) that is considered not democratic. But to just take a woman and allow psy to have her for explorative research on how-to control, extract and terrorise, for situations of National Security (in some hypothetical situation down the track) is obscene, even in a dictatorship.


The understanding of information – now that’s where opinion must be allowed. A woman CANNOT be said to NOT have the capacity to understand what the torturing psy is doing to them – when the woman clearly name it TORTURE. Yet that's what psy do time and time again, systematically, because neurotoxins ARE torture, ECT is torture and psychosurgery is torture... yet our government legislates for the forcing of this on women and profits by that exploitation of women. Golden handshakes with the companies that want to test the torture equipment are given to political parties.


Psy and the MH coterie cannot be trusted in their judgement, which is obscured by powerplay, greed, vested interests and disgusting outrageous prejudice, born out of the eugenic’s era.  Yet, psy are given authority to judge a women, judge her mentality as 'ill' so they can exploit her. And for a woman to be called such a label by her husband, very threatening indeed, because what if he then fingers her to the psy, has her put away, so that when she's allowed freedom she's be obedient to him, because there's not a lot worst than the torture psychiatrists can put women through. To force a woman into being subject matter for a psy to examine and maltreat is one of the most horrifying torturous ordeals a person can suffer. Prolonged and indefinite torture – for the purposes of experimentation is NOT LAWFUL to legislate. To allow psy to slander and then legitimatise that slander as ‘medical’ then allow psy to conduct vile lucrative experiments and call that ‘medicine’ isn’t lawful legislation, and must be repealed.

Tribunal rubber stamps psychiatrists dictatorship of Fiona

SIGN this petition to Free Fiona Smith, #Right2Refuse protester & platypus advocate

The Mental Health Tribunal, yesterday  rubber stamped psychiatrists dictatorship of Fiona Smith.

Despite Fiona Smith giving an eloquent and well-presented argument, and putting forth the obvious unlawful detaining of her and injecting of her, the Mental Health Tribunal chose to continue to disregard section 4.2 of the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014, and rubber stamped an order to persecute Fiona Smith for another 12 weeks.

That's 6 forced depot injections, it could kill her, if the maltreating team don't taper the dose, or stop forcing it on her.

The opening sentence from the psychiatrist launched into calling Fiona Smith out for 'antipsychiatry' politics. We had to interject that this was invalid under 4.2 of the Mental Health Act, where politics, protests, opinions and previous diagnosis cannot be said to be reason to place a Treatment Order on a person.

The maltreating team mumbled their psychobabble, and it didn't matter that no one heard them, the Tribunal Panel just went along with what the doc ordered.

To do that to Fiona Smith, who is so well-versed in law, so eloquent, despite the torturously high dose of drugs they have forcibly injected into her, is disgusting. To name Fiona Smith's political views as 'thought disordered' is just ridiculously evil, but also in clear violation of the Mental Health Act 2014.

Fiona Smith will be challenging the tribunal Admin now at VCAT.

We cannot have Fiona Smith destroyed by these monsters. She is one of the most courageous people in the world, and a peaceful resistance that the world needs.

Keep sharing this petition. World-wide support is needed.

ALSO - 

SIGN Vic Gov e-petition for the #Right2Refuse https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/council/petitions/electronic-petitions/view-e-petitions/details/12/159  

Grievance: The Petition of certain citizens of the State of Victoria draws to the attention of the Legislative Council the much needed human rights currently being denied to Victorians, that is, the right to refuse psychiatrists’ products, procedures, programs and beds. To force Victorians to submit to what psychiatrist’s dictate, to their environmentally unfriendly, unethical, and unhealthy products, is undemocratic and violates the United Nations ‘Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, as well as sections 8.2 and 8.3 of the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. Victorians must have the right to choose, refuse and conscientiously object to pharmaceutical products, medical procedures or programs for personal, political or environmental reasons and have their right to refuse upheld. Victorians should not be discriminated against on the basis of a psychiatrist’s diagnosis of a person having a psychiatric disability, nor subjected forcibly to human research on this basis.

Action: The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative Council call on the Government to repeal legislation that forces psychiatrists’ products, procedures, programs and beds upon Victorians.

The #right2refuse psychiatrists

Fiona Smith #Right2Refuse protester has been left without Legal Aid for MH Tribunal, tomorrow 23rd Oct 11:30am, at Royal Melbourne John Cade. Despite all due diligence in attempting to get a Legal Aid lawyer for this hearing. We are still collecting letters of support.
Sign the petition - http://chng.it/j9X8xNq7LB

#Victorians! Demand the #Right2Refuse psychiatrists' products, procedures & programs. Sign the Official Government #epetition148 https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/council/petitions/electronic-petitions/view-e-petitions/details/12/159

Fiona Smith free from arbitrary detention

while Fiona Smith has got free from arbitrary detention in Royal Melbourne John Cade, (yesterday afternoon) she is still being forcibly subjected to Rispiridone Long Acting Injection (RLAI). 

What lucrative research is Fiona Smith being exploited for?

she's likely being exploited by the e-STAR data-base research group https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-244X-12-25

Protest on Wednesday, 23rd Oct at Royal Melbourne John Cade

for Fiona Smith and the #Right2Refuse, coinciding with the Mental Health Tribunal to stop the CTO on Fiona Smith, located in this building.

Compliance with torturous drugs, is about indoctrinating a person into denial

Mental Health Tribunal Administration, and Royal Melbourne John Cade, must not act as an assessor of #compliance to RLAI and other drugs being forced, as if that's a point of law, it isn't, it's their research agenda, that should NOT be allowed, most especially given the horrific allergic reactions Fiona Smith is suffering as a result of RLAI, that are life threatening and life destroying. To force this drug on Fiona cannot be considered medicine, it is the opposite of medicine - a clear violation, chemical assault.

The #right2refuse is a political point-of-view

How can Mental Health Tribunal Administration, and Royal Melbourne John Cade, even think of medicalising a political point-of-view, well-recognised world-wide in the human rights movement -  that of demanding the #right2refuse RLAI and other psychdrugs, products, procedures and programs - most especially given that Fiona Smith has been protesting for years on this issue? It is unconstitutional to deny a political point-of-view and medicalise it, and subject the person with that political point-of-view to known neurotoxins, to shut them down, silence them, and break them into compliance with another point-of-view. It is dictatorial. It is also a clear violation of ethics, neuroleptics are considered one of the worst tortures in the world, that cause such horrific damage to a person's physical health.

The aim, for Fiona Smith, is to have the RLAI stopped immediately so that Fiona Smith doesn't have to suffer this further, the harmful and potentially lethal effects of this drug, and reduce the Rispiridone tablets gradually in a harm reduction method with a supportive GP.

Action is needed urgently on Fiona Smith's #right2refuse. Share, write blogs, letters of support, be there to protest on Wednesday if you can. Also do sign this petition - http://chng.it/SSzBQmrCcD