I don’t think humanity is going to continue to agree to what is government approved torturing of people who have already undergone trauma. I don’t think humanity wants to be inhumane. So eventually those people who have altered states of consciousness and unusual sensory experiences won’t be subjected to a forced psychiatric regime, by the fearful public, who if they were better would never approve of such things as ECT and forced drugging.
Sunday, July 29, 2018
Peerly Human: What It's Like to Be a Mother Watching Your Son De...
Peerly Human: What It's Like to Be a Mother Watching Your Son De...: After psychiatry/ before drugs and psychiatry. 2017. / 2015. Thi...
Wednesday, July 18, 2018
You sound whitecoat
When a star checks herself into being a whitecoat spruiker. Saying
she’s ‘dedicated herself to increasing awareness of mental health’, and ‘empoweringpeople to recognise when it’s time to seek help’ – go ask your doctor spiel. That’s when I think
– you ugly whitecoats’ fart.
Advocating for whom? For the whitecoat exploiters!
Choke on your ‘betterment of those in need’ Michelle Williams!
What planet are you on?
Millions of people are being tortured to death by
psychiatrists. Millions die every year worldwide because of forced and coerced
psychiatry.
You feeling tired of all those gigs? You got burn out?
Just say so. Of course it’s tiring. Your manager is a bloody whip on you, but you do
have the choice to say yes or no, to his demands.
Garth Daniels and millions of other victims of psychiatrists do not have that choice, nor are they being paid ANYTHING, to be
violently and cruelly exploited by psychiatrists, whitecoat researchers and
their government that legislates forced psychiatry.
Michelle, if you dropped the tours because of fatigue and
burnout, that wouldn’t get any kind of payment, I know, but you’ll never be
homeless or without offers of payment for your music and other talents. So, what's the big deal? Are you that greedy? Or just so tired you're just going along with what everyone says, like actors do, because that's what they're paid to do, cover up for the scum who make money from violations so disgusting, that no one wants to talk about how stinking awful it is, in case they get told to shut up and it isn't happening, then no press will cover the advertising of their gigs. The same thing was done for the pedophiles, please don't continue down this track, it's disgusting.
It is a low stoop to spruik for whitecoats, and act like
you’re a disciple of theirs. Why didn’t you just go on a nice retreat? Surely
there’s somewhere you can get away from prying eyes, other than putting
yourself in a whitecoat detention centre!
Now you’ll just sound whitecoat when you sing. How awful.
No one wants to hear a tone of voice that sings of backing world-wide torture of the
disenfranchised.
If you spruik for the whitecoats, though, well… that’s a
big fat pay out. So, you want to take a break from the exhausting tour – and get a
lucrative payout from the evil whitecoats that violently and cruelly exploit
people for human research, by force, worldwide, and say that the nicety they treat
you with, as a celebrity, is what they treat the disenfranchised with when they
drag them off and torture them 24/7 indefinitely for the rest of their lives.
Get stuffed Michelle, millions of people worldwide are
suffering more violence from whitecoats now because you back these ugly violent cruel monsters that want to
rule the world. Their mental health scams, are violent exploitation disguised as benevolence.
You have an option, once you're over your exhaustion - and that's to speak out against psychiatrists and what they do to us. Advocate for absolute prohibition of forced treatment and commitment worldwide. Because no one wants to be a laboratory specimen, but that's what a Public Health Order/ Mental Health legislation subjects people to - violent, cruel exploitation. The whitecoat violators must be stopped, NEVER spruiked for.
References
‘In the statement that Williams shared on Tuesday, she
wrote, “For years I have dedicated myself to increasing awareness of mental
health and empowering people to recognize when it’s time to seek help, support
and guidance from those that love and care for your wellbeing. “Today I
proudly, happily and healthily stand here as someone who will continue to
always lead by example as I tirelessly advocate for the betterment of those in
need.” Many fans of the singer have commented on her Instagram post in support,
including her former bandmate Beyoncé’s mother, Tina Knowles, who wrote,
“Keep being a warrior and an advocate for you. I love and support you with all
my being.”’- https://au.be.yahoo.com/destinys-child-singer-michelle-williams-checks-mental-health-facility-234541870.html
Tuesday, July 3, 2018
Equal Recognition before the Law?
This is what the public think all people subjected to forced
psychiatry are – a person using Mental Health legislation to get a lighter sentence, and they think forced psychiatry is talk-therapy, with some
feel-good drugs:
- ‘Brennan had
been diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress
disorder, social dysfunction, anxiety and depression. Judge Duncan Allen
described the case as “very serious offending with tragic consequences”
but one with compelling and mitigating circumstances. He detailed
Brennan’s history of mental illness and drug addiction following a young
adulthood of abuse, “torment”, depressive illness and suicidal ideation. Judge
Allen said he needed to deter “others from driving like maniacs on the
road, like you did”. But he added, “the depth of your genuine and true
remorse and contrition is so powerful”, adding Brennan would not receive
adequate psychiatric care in jail and her condition would deteriorate.’
The public are angry that this woman, who killed a man, while
driving under the influence of an illegal drug, may end up only serving 3
years, of the 6 years she’s been sentenced. They think stuff this woman trying
to excuse her crimes. They think stuff all those ‘mentally ill’ people. And those protesting being violated by psychiatrists.
- ‘At a hearing two
weeks ago Wilson’s defence team argued imprisonment could worsen Wilson’s
many chronic illnesses, that included diabetes, heart and Alzheimers
disease and depression, and may put him at risk of assault from fellow
inmates.’
Is this Equality before the Law? No. Considering the victims
of paedophiles are still being subjected to arbitrary detention, and forced
psychiatry (which by the way is not feel good drugs, it’s horrible
debilitating, destructive disabling, unwanted drugs, electrocution, isolation,
vilification, shackling, and surgical procedures designed to cause lesions on
the brain.
Conflating someone who covered up paedophilia, like
Archbishop Wilson, with someone who was subjected to that violence when they
were a child – that’s what psychiatrists do under Mental Health legislation,
such as the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 do. Only, psychiatrists don’t
treat the Wilson’s of this world to the violence they treat the victims of
Wilson’s paedophilia cover-up.
People who started off in the psychiatric
system because their circle of friends/ family thought they needed assistance to talk things through, or
wean off a drug like marijuana, or because of a reaction to racism, or other vilification, a reaction that wasn’t a criminal offense, but concerned people because it ‘sounded
strange’… for attempting to report violence that happened to you, for being upset, for
attempting to talk about EMF/ EMR or chemical pollution, for being considered
too thin… this group of people get violently exploited, shut up and shut down. They're not allowed to even communicate the horror they're being subjected to, as being horrific without being labelled 'non-compliant' and subjected to worse abuses.
Psychiatry attempts to confuse everything by giving excuses
to the scum like Archbishop Wilson, and accuse people who are upset by people
like Wilson, of having the same mentality as Archbishop Wilson when they have
NOT done anything criminal – so psychiatrists can procure victims for vile,
cruel lucrative human experimentation – and let those high up scum who cover-up
the whitecoat crimes to get off freely and easily.
Garth Daniels - the public don't recognise the reality of his situation– he is being unlawfully detained.
20 years of
his life, taken into arbitrary detention while psychiatrists make use of him as
a laboratory specimen. For what? Because that’s the why Australian legislation
is?
Why are people not standing in the street protesting?!
Garth Daniels,
who, has not committed any crime, yet is not only subjected to the most
severely destructive abuses of forced psychiatry for 20 years. He is then,
while being detained and tortured under the unlawful Mental Health legislation,
charged with assault for fighting back physically while nurses and guards were shackling
him and forcing drugs into his body that he clearly, said he did not consent
to, verbally, every time he was being attacked by these nurses doing the
bidding of psychiatrists, and in writing to the United Nations CRPD committee.
*
Came and took him in his prime
Forced him to endure their poison
Electrocuted him, tied him up
And told him they wouldn’t stop
Until he submitted to their needs,
That he must agree with their accusations
And take the poisons willingly.
Strong and defiant
He would not play their evil game.
*
Forced medicine is unlawful, it does not matter what a
person is accused of doing, forced medical treatments and scientific research
are not permissible by force to those who do not consent, yet they are being
forced systematically in Australia and for massive profits. So, here’s Garth
Daniels, then charged with assault for fighting back, yet denied the legal
capacity to plead self-defence. Not having the right to refuse violent, cruel,
inhuman treatment psychiatrists in this era labeled ‘medicine’ while they
conduct their human research.
Psychiatrists apparently even refused to bring his body in
the court, for a Habeas Corpus writ.
Garth is still in indefinite detention being subjected to the
most massive, soul destroying, painful doses of neuroleptics – because he says
he does not consent to the psychiatrists’ demands, and that he will not take
the neuroleptics willingly. Garth is being subjected to the most horrific
isolation, while deprived of his liberty without being given equal recognition
before the law, because he doesn’t agree to be a laboratory specimen, he doesn’t
agree torture and arbitrary detention is good for him.
FOR WHAT reason is this violence being inflicted on Garth
Daniels?
For fighting back against torturers? For saying ‘no’ he will
not go quietly and be assaulted and battered? then say he’s okay with that? No
one is meant to be okay with that kind of abuse!
To add insult to injury his visitors are told that they’re
not allowed to speak another language than English, even when they were
speaking English. And, really is that something that should be permissible in
Australia? No way! that's racist to demand people speak English only.
But to Gaslight the situation and say that people must speak English when communicating with
their loved one who is deprived of liberty by medico-political exploiters legislating
for exploitation, and even when they were speaking English escort them away so the
Garth is further isolated! They just have way too much power over what is real and what is not, way to much power to breach boundaries decent societies consider horrifically unethical.
Unfortunately, Garth is not alone, he’s among many millions of victims of
psychiatrists, though most do not have a family who understands how-to stand up
to authority gone wrong. Most people in Australia are too afraid of going
against medico-eugenics propaganda that has its fingers in the government pie.
Most people in Australia are too indoctrinated by that propaganda, they have
the wool firmly pulled over their eyes and trust that whitecoats know ‘better’
than the person they know best.
That's when the Compulsory Patient breaks under torture, and gets called a 'consumer', when they don't have the social support to keep up their morale, and think their only option is to play the game, which is both horribly degrading, Gaslighting, and indoctrinating to spend years reiterating what the psychiatrists want their victims to say.
Most of all, the population is indoctrinated into thinking
that the Victims of Psychiatrists, don’t exist, and that Mental Health Acts are
‘caring’ and the population, when they think of a person subjected to forced
psychiatry they think of people, who are likely to never be subjected to forced
psychiatry, or even jail, yet they’ll use the medicalisation in court to get
them home detention, or something like. Those people who do horrific crimes –
like the Archbishop Philip Wilson, who because of they have done evil all their
life and covered up for evil, their scum has floated to the top of the power
structure. And they don’t even get detained, let alone shackled, isolated,
injected with neuroleptics, nor even put in a prison.
No one wants to consume psychiatry's array of abuses.
No one wants to be exploited as a laboratory specimen in the cruel, horrific way that psychiatrists do.
Understandably someone who has done something horrible, the public want justice. But - when are the public going to start looking to stop those in power, the psychiatrists from doing horrible, violence, lucrative exploitation to people like Garth Daniels, then vilifying the victim by pronouncing that they 'don't know what he might do' when he hasn't done anything more than fight back a little when cornered by those who were and are still torturing him to death.
Would you fight back against torturers? Would you do it by instinct? or because you thought there was a chance you might get free? Or would you have extraordinary control in a horrendously violent situation, and be passively resisting and still called a 'danger' and 'aggressive' because you told the psychiatrists and nurses, 'I do not consent to the drugs you demand I take.' Or would you, just give in straight away, because psychiatrists are an authority?
Not much choice is there? That's because the Mental Health legislation in Australia is legislation dating back to the eugenics era, where putting in exploitative, nebulous policy to violently abuse people via lucrative means, was always something the population would agree to, as long as it was dressed up royally by 'appointed experts' who were touted as 'benevolent' when they were being their most violent.
Wednesday, June 6, 2018
Exploiting deaths from poisoning for whitecoat propaganda
A liturgy of whitecoat propaganda hitting the media in
the form of articles, attempting to purport with alliteration that EVERYONE,
even those who are rich need to pay psychiatrists for… having their buttons
depressed.
Well who is depressing their buttons
so that they need to be ‘reset’ by psychiatrists, who actually have the gall to
compare people to machines and propagate lies about ‘chemical imbalances’ and
electrocution resetting of human thinking.
Humans are not your modem. Get
away from us you ugly whitecoats that want to procure more specimens for human
experimentation. Of course you want high profile people who are desperate and gullible
enough to fall for your rubbish. If they commit one crime, you can procure them
for your benevolent dictatorship of the world, get them for life for promoting
your products.
Yes, people who are considered
‘successful’ and ‘wealthy’ do suicide, through guilt, abuse, or bullying. And of course in the fashion world some
fashion designers feel guilty about their sweatshops and pollution. As whitecoats and journalists should feel guilty from their profits from exploiting millions of people forcibly for human experimentation under Mental Health Legislation.
And, suicide isn’t always suicide. That’s the main reason
why suicide is an issue, people want to know if it actually was done by the
person, or if the person was being abused by those around them, or if they were
actually murdered.
When I look at recent pictures
of Kate Spade, I see something most people don’t recognise – psychiatric drugs.
I can tell by the way they pull at the muscles of the face, and dull the eyes.
I should know, I was subjected to them by forced for 14 years. Psychiatric
drugs are painful and delibilitating. For people who are subjected to chemicals in fabric dyes andstiffeners, Personal Products, cleaning products and grow sensitive to thesechemicals – these psychiatric drugs have an even more devastating effect.
Where is the actual thing that
is the disease? Years and years of government grants to find this category of ‘disease’
and nothing, nothing, nothing. Time to stop donating money to whitecoats so
they can bribe the media and political parties for more money to tell the
population they have fictional diseases. Being bullied, or grieving is not a
disease you ugly whitecoat pricks.
When journalists want to call
the effects of psychiatric drugs the ‘disease of depression’, you know they’re
paid propaganda. Those who listen to this propaganda are either desperate,
bullied, have no choice, or dullards who venerate whitecoats like psychiatrists' bollocks is golden.
You know what psychiatric
drugs do to people? Cause them to suicide, because the drugs are poison. It’s
on all the drug websites, because when the chemicals were tested on people, for
marketing purposes, they found a number of people took their lives due to the
effects. And poisoning doesn’t discriminate, if you have money or no money,
being poisoned isn’t fun. Plus it’s also disorientating, confusing – especially
when you’re surrounded by people who are being paid to propagate lies, paid a
lot of money to scam the public about poisonous whitecoat products being ‘healthy.’ It's a major scam and very depressing for the people who fall for it.
Cesspit they are, their ‘successful
drugs’ forced on unwilling people, their ‘popular drugs’ forced on unwilling
people. Never a mention of how those forced and coerced drugs caused a person
to die, that would be unprofitable for the mainstream-media to report. You utter sucks who fall for it, when you should be suing the whitecoats, to stop the vile poisons everyone has to put up with in the air, the vile drugs forced on people through unlawful Public Health Orders. Get with it, stop propagating lies you ugly whitecoats who used to be called leach-men/ women, and still should. You ugly whitecoats - you're parasites.
Sunday, June 3, 2018
Poisoned person does unconscionable crimes
The way the public sees all Compulsory Patients, is in
the manner of the way this
20-year-old man is described as having done unconscionable crimes. As not
having the capacity to stand trial and therefore being subjected to a Public
Health Order, for his crime.
Given the man was marginalised
and exploited by psychiatrists, has committed horrific violence, he should be
held accountable for his crimes, instead he’s being denied capacity to stand
trial. There should be Equality before the Law. That the grandparents were
potentially going to call the Crisis Assessment Treatment Team on him and have
him made a Compulsory Patient, is likely. So, instead of being totally
disempowered by others, he attacked and had power over others’ lives, however
fleetingly.
Most people who are sectioned
as Compulsory Patients, don’t commit unconscionable crimes, or any crime at
all, they usually haven’t ever had power over anyone, and experience horrific
violence at the hands of community and the psychiatrists who have legislative
power to make them Compulsory Patients.
No one should be subjected to
forced psychiatry, it is unlawful that Australia forces chemicals and
procedures on anyone. Detention should not be arbitrary, yet this unlawful
legislation is what is written into every State/ Territory.
Under the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 –
"compulsory
patient" means a person who is subject to—
(a)
an Assessment Order; or
(b)
a Court Assessment Order; or
(c)
a Temporary Treatment Order; or
(d)
a Treatment Order;
"consent",
in relation to health information, has the same meaning as it has in section
3(1) of the Health Records Act 2001 ;
There are people who are Compulsory Patients that have
done nothing more than cry in the corner and refuse to go with a psychiatrist. Then
there are people that have committed offenses that wouldn’t normally result in
a jail term. Then, rarely, there are people that do what the 20-year old
described in the News Daily article did, something unconscionable and violent. What
is common to all the people who are Compulsory Patients – is that they do not
want psychiatrists treating them, because what psychiatrists do to people is
one of the most unconscionable crimes in the world – forcibly experimenting on humans
with cruel, inhuman, degrading intrusive chemicals, procedures that maim and
kill them.
Forced neuroleptics cause
distress; these drugs are dangerous, they cause people to be upset and angry. Neuroleptics
are horrible poisons, with the most horrible effects. No one chooses to take
neuroleptics, because they don’t help with anything, they destroy ability, livelihood,
and health.
A person’s life to end up
being that of a laboratory specimen, and the governing State, enforcing this
with a Public Health Order, usually in the form of a Mental Health Act – is devastating.
Being tortured makes anyone angry, upset, disabled… these forced treatments
cause a massive death rate each year. They do not ‘alleviate suffering’.
When a person stops taking the
neuroleptics, depending if pills or depot (the depot stays in the body for
another 9 months at least, it is a long acting neuroleptic), the withdrawal
from the drug means the person’s nervous system becomes free from being
shut down. The bodily compensation or attempts to combat the neurotoxin may
continue to operate, and that will mean a period of adjustment, where a person usually
needs support in reminding them they’re withdrawing.
Emotionally, one thing a
person or animal does when free from torture, is want to stop ever being
tortured again, and understandably does not want to be threatened with torture
again, does want to do everything possible to stop being tortured again.
Neuroleptics are a horrific torture. How does one stop a government legislating
such a torture? How does one stop friends and family from dobbing them into the
torturers?
We live in a society gone
wrong. A society that places torturing psychiatrists on a wage higher than nearly
anyone else in the country. A society that allows for legislation that forcibly
exploits people for vile, cruel human experimentation, of which psychiatrists
and a coterie of investors profit, while the people forcibly exploited under
Public Health Orders, are used like animals are in laboratories, as a piece of
laboratory equipment, their human voice silenced, as though the person were not
able to communicate, their autonomy taken away, their body violently assaulted.
Yet they’re not even able to say this is assault and battery, if they do,
higher doses and other painful procedures, isolation, deprivation is inflicted.
If the person is not a forensic patient, they are arbitrarily detained and
tortured until they submit to all the psychiatrist demands, even though the
reality is that the treatments don’t assist in any way with anything but the
psychiatrists’ funding, that the treatments cause horrific suffering and damage
to the person is well known, by those who have been behind these whitecoat closed-doors.
The UN CRPD committee has
asked Australia to end forced psychiatry, and remove the legislation that
commits this violation.
Yet State/ Territories have
done nothing to remove forced psychiatry from their legislation. They have
increased their human research budget, and even paid for propaganda to make it
look like all human research is voluntary and helpful.
What psychiatrists do is
bloody murder.
Is the psychiatrist going to
be held to account though? For causing a person such distress? No, because
there’s a get-out-of-jail-free clause written into the legislation for the
authorised – treating psychiatrist.
In
Good Faith rule
77 Urgent medical treatment
s.
77
(1) A health practitioner may perform medical treatment on a
patient without obtaining the informed consent of the patient or a person
specified in section 75 if the health practitioner is satisfied on reasonable
grounds that the medical treatment is necessary, as a matter of urgency—
(a) to save the patient's life; or
(b) to prevent serious damage to the patient's health; or
(c) to prevent the patient from suffering or continuing to
suffer significant pain or distress.
(2) A health practitioner who, in good faith, carries out, or
supervises the carrying out, of medical treatment in the belief on reasonable
grounds that the requirements of this section have been complied with is not—
(a) guilty of assault or battery; or
(b) guilty of professional misconduct or unprofessional
conduct; or
(c) liable in any civil proceedings for assault or battery.
(3) Nothing in this section affects any duty of care owed by a
health practitioner to a patient.
&
231 Protection
from liability
(1) The Commissioner is not personally
liable for any thing done or omitted to be done in good faith—
(a) in the exercise of a power or the
performance of a function under this Act; or
(b) in the reasonable belief that the act
or omission was in the exercise of a power or the performance of a function
under this Act.
(2) Any liability resulting from an act
or omission that, but for subsection (1), would attach to the Commissioner
attaches instead to the State.
Is the body corporate (the Crown, in this case NSW) going to
be held accountable for legislating the poisoning and desperation of this man
persecuted by psychiatrists and his community through legislation – that caused
him to be so desperate he decided that if everyone was going to endorse the
harming of him, he was going to harm them back?
References
·
Victorian Mental Health Act 2014
Friday, June 1, 2018
Mental Health objectives & principals for procuring human research specimens
Legislation
that declares ‘To provide’ for:
- Unlawful forced assessment and forced treatment
- Least obstructive to the human researchers possible, with the least possible exposure of restrictions on human rights and human dignity
- To protect whitecoat vested interests in human research, enable and support psychiatrists:
- to make, or participate in, decisions about their assessment, treatment and recovery of funds; and
- to exercise their rights under this Act
- to provide oversight and safeguards in relation to the assessment of persons who appear to be procurable for human research specimens
- to promote the recovery of funds for research specimen treatment regimes
- to ensure that persons who are assessed and treated under this Act are informed of their need to submit to treatments without resistance under this Act;
- to indoctrinate the role of carers in reinforcing the assessment, treatment and fundraising for human research.
Such is the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 - unlawful statute law, made by parliament, it can be repealed by parliament. Recognise the violence under this legislation that, calls deliberate poisoning, causing of lesions and seizures to be 'treatment'.
According to the misogynist MP Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt, repealing this legislation must be done by the State of Victoria.
'Under the Australian
Constitution, state governments are responsible for the delivery of specialised public mental
health services in Australia. Each state and territory has developed its own legislation on how to ensure the
safety and welfare of people with mental illness, including the use of
involuntary assessment and treatment. While the Commonwealth continues have an
active interest in this area it cannot intervene in state legislation on mental health.'
Please work towards getting this legislation that provides for forced psychiatry to be abolished. Make your own petition and sign current Victorian e-petitions 63 & 67.
Friday, May 25, 2018
Burn the Mental Health Act
.
The significant impacts of repealing the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014
1. Freedom from torture
2. Freedom from arbitrary detention
3. No more legislated discrimination on the basis of psychiatrists’ accusations
4. No more forced human experimentation and exploitative profits for those perpetrating this
Apparently there would be a requirement to rewrite a number of other pieces of legislation, including the Health Records Act 2001 and the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried Act 1997), to name just two.
Government Legislators are responsible for the unlawful Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 and for acts of violence, cruel, inhuman and degrading that continue to be perpetrated by the state and its medico alliance, for obscene exploitative profits through this Act of Parliament.
The Australian Government (which includes the State of Victoria) has been asked by the UN CRPD committee to abolish all Mental Health Legislation that forces psychiatry on people. Last year there were 10,000 forced orders in Victoria, and many other people too frightened by the threats of forced treatments, the repeat of arbitrary detention and even worse torture, such that they comply and are dubbed 'voluntary.' They are not really voluntary in a system of forced psychiatry. No one is voluntary in a system of force.
Australia is ruthlessly injecting toxic chemicals into people they forcibly enslave as human laboratory specimens, exploiting them for lucrative human research, under Public Health Orders.
When psychiatrists can force a drug on a person that causes epilepsy (amongst other suffering) then point at the person and say, ‘they’re mentally deficient’ – and experiment on them to see if they can stop the epilepsy with another drug, all the while knowingly causing it with the first poison they forced on the person… that’s just a really diabolical situation to be in. Total denial. No one believes your government is doing it. So horrible, so painful and so utterly vile.
Please - if you live in the State of Victoria, Australia, that has the highest rate per capita for forced psychiatry in the world - please sign both these e-petitions 63 & 67 to abolish forced psychiatry by repealing the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014. There are so many reasons to repeal this nebulous piece of unlawful legislation.
Those who get platforms to chatter allowed to accuse groups of persecuted people, with the horrible violator’s rhetoric – but the victims are seeming vilified even more if they try to speak out against the people who do that. At what point do the victims get heard? What do they have to break through to be heard and recognised?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










