I don’t think humanity is going to continue to agree to what is government approved torturing of people who have already undergone trauma. I don’t think humanity wants to be inhumane. So eventually those people who have altered states of consciousness and unusual sensory experiences won’t be subjected to a forced psychiatric regime, by the fearful public, who if they were better would never approve of such things as ECT and forced drugging.
'I don't want anyone else to suffer the way I have. I don't want forced psychiatry and forced psychiatric treatments in psychwards,' Janita Thurston. Please sign Janita's petition for freedom from forcibly injected neurotoxins AND her other petition to reform the South Australian Mental Health Act, so that it doesn't include forced psychiatry.
Janita Thurston is well-aware of the devastating effects that forced psychiatric drugs have on her life, and yet she is being denied her autonomy, said not to have the capacity to understand the perpetrating psychiatrists’ point-of-view. Why should she understand and be obedient to perpetrators? She has been fully aware since psychiatrists first harmed her while she was still in secondary school, that psychiatrists were harming her and they are. Since 2002, various psychiatrists have tested out their products on her, naming the harms of the neurotoxins they forced on her as ‘a disease’ instead of recognising what psychiatrists know is one of the many horrible effects of neuroleptics.
Janita Thurston has been asking for 18 years, for the right to refuse psychiatrists torturous products, procedures, programs… yet has been continuously used by psychiatrists for various disgusting cruel human research studies. This is likely to be the current research Janita Thurston is being used for, without permission, without her knowledge – 2016-2020 Project Grant; $626,179 National Health and Medical Research Council (NHRMC), Australia: 1102628 Morgan, V., McGrath, J., Galletly, C., Harvey, C., Castle, D., Cohen, M., Jablensky, A., Carr, V., Neil, A., Wattereus, A Title: “An empirical framework for assessing mortality and morbidity in people with psychotic disorders: 7-year prospective and 10-year retrospective follow-up of 2075 participants in the Survey of High Impact Psychosis (SHIP) using linked registers”
What can a person do to escape a violent cruel regime such as forced psychiatry is? Victims of psychiatrists are not even permitted the right to self-defence.
If the history and current violations of psychiatrists on Janita Thurston were made into a movie – you would truly recognise her as the heroic protagonist, against the vile, cruel government legislated regime that is the mental health system in South Australia.
Janita advocates on behalf of animals and wants the right to boycott animal cruelty Janita is aware of the horrific animal cruelty that pharmaceutical companies inflict on those animals they test these products on. Janita wants the right to refuse these products on that basis, and the basis of her right as a vegan, as well as reasons of her own right to life, right to health, and right to freedom from torture...
Please sign Janita's petition for freedom from forcibly injected neurotoxins AND her other petition to reform the South Australian Mental Health Act, so that it doesn't include forced psychiatry.
For Government to legislate for psy to conduct perverted
experiments on women in order to make them more pliable to other kinds of
predators – how can that be justified in a democratic country? It is a vile,
cruel dictatorship that allows psy to perpetrate upon vulnerable women.
How is it that torture of a woman can be called
‘care’? The violation of a woman forthe purposes of perverted medical experimentation is evil, and to
legislate that is evil dictatorship, encroaching on a young woman’s right to
refuse the penetration of her body. And for psy to ‘plan’ to do this violation
to a woman is utterly obscene.
To restrict a woman’s life to that of serving her
exploiters as a laboratory specimen, is a heinous crime – and for a government to
legislate this heinous crime as legitimate by naming it ‘medicine’ is the most
soul-destroying, life-wrecking regime to live under, for the women
subjected to this. Her right to life, family, love, her health – being
massacred. what does she have to celebrate unless society starts to do
something to get the government to stop violating her? Without people to be there with her, doing that
with her, she’s ganged up on by the psy and the government that allows it.
To legislate for psy’s treatment of a woman, based on psy’s
slander of a person, so that psy can profit out of VOP flesh, is not lawful
legislation.
To legislate for the use of police officers to force a woman into a psy’s bed, where she is then stripped and penetrated, injected
with neurotoxins that torture her – cause physical pain and mental anguish,
diminish physical and mental capacities, and are designed to disrupt profoundly
her senses and personality… is not lawful legislation. And is a vile misuse of
emergency powers. To call an organisation that inflicts such torture ‘the
department of health and wellbeing’ – another insult to the physical realities,
and gaslighting of her world.
It is never correct or preferable for a court of law to
decide to allow a psy to torture a women.
The calling of a woman’s decision-making ‘impaired’ when she
refuses to be forcibly penetrated by a psy, refuses to swallow a psy’s
neurotoxin, is an extremely corrupt, violent use of medicalisation on a woman’s social and political rights – particularly the right to refuse
exploitation, violation, and condemnation. The right to refuse the harm that psy inflicts on her, the
right to speak out against the slander psy insults her with, the right to ask
to seek justice… The politics of being antipsychiatry and the right to refuse
psy – that should be a human right in any democratic court of law.
It is disgustingly inappropriate to legislate for the violation
of a woman, by injecting her forcibly with neurotoxins, destroying her
hopes and dreams of living without the persecution of psy.
What a cost to her humanity! To her dignity! To her health!
To her viability! To her fertility and creative spirit! To enslave women for the purposes of psy’s vile, cruel human research and do this through
a court of law, a court that declares itself not to be an adversarial hearing
but rather an inquisitorial one, that doesn’t have to prove fact or evidence!
No rules of evidence in a Mental Health Tribunal – the psy can say whatever
they want about the women they’re persecuting, and the psy’s wants and
needs to exploit her, will be routinely rubber stamped! (In normal jurisdictions Courts and Tribunals are a purely adversarial
hearing).
There is no place for inflicting torture on a woman,
there’s no excuse as a matter of National Security, and even if it were for the
purposes of National Security (which psy isn’t) that is considered not
democratic. But to just take a woman and allow psy to have her for
explorative research on how-to control, extract and terrorise, for situations
of National Security (in some hypothetical situation down the track) is obscene, even in a dictatorship.
The understanding of information – now that’s where opinion
must be allowed. A woman CANNOT be said to NOT have the capacity to understand
what the torturing psy is doing to them – when the woman clearly name it TORTURE. Yet that's what psy do time and time again, systematically, because neurotoxins ARE torture, ECT is torture and psychosurgery is torture... yet our government legislates for the forcing of this on women and profits by that exploitation of women. Golden handshakes with the companies that want to test the torture equipment are given to political parties.
Psy and the MH coterie cannot be trusted in their judgement,
which is obscured by powerplay, greed, vested interests and disgusting outrageous
prejudice, born out of the eugenic’s era. Yet, psy are given authority to judge a women, judge her mentality as 'ill' so they can exploit her. And for a woman to be called such a label by her husband, very threatening indeed, because what if he then fingers her to the psy, has her put away, so that when she's allowed freedom she's be obedient to him, because there's not a lot worst than the torture psychiatrists can put women through. To force a woman into being subject
matter for a psy to examine and maltreat is one of the most horrifying
torturous ordeals a person can suffer. Prolonged and indefinite torture – for
the purposes of experimentation is NOT LAWFUL to legislate. To allow psy to
slander and then legitimatise that slander as ‘medical’ then allow psy to
conduct vile lucrative experiments and call that ‘medicine’ isn’t lawful
legislation, and must be repealed.
Psychiatric drugs not only harm
the humans that have these drugs forced on them, psychiatric drugs are also
polluting our rivers and killing the life that lives there.
20% of Australians are forced to take neurotoxins, synthetic
products, made by pharmaceutical companies that exceed CO2 emissions of the
automotive industry.
These forced products also contribute to plastic waste, and
incinerator burn-off. If the 5 million Australians forced to take
psychiatrists’ neurotoxins, had the right to refuse these toxic products,
imagine the reduction in pollution, how our rivers and life there would more
easily flourish, rather than suffer and die.
Platypus don’t fare well on psychdrugs any more than humans
do. No one wants psychdrugs in their body! While our government still
legislates to force psychiatric drugs into humans, our rivers are becoming
increasingly polluted by these toxins. There are massive health risks to humans
and wildlife with the amount of psychdrugs found in wastewater. And these
pharmaceutical products are not easily removed from wastewater, which is then
dumped into rivers, and used in farming.
The Royal Commission into BLOODY psychiatrists’ & mental
health association company violations, is doing nothing to stop forced
psychiatric drugging, instead, the Victorian Government wants to twist and
pervert what Australians most violated by psychiatrists are saying, and then to
our disgust, highlight those perpetrating psychiatrists who submitted to the
Royal Commission for more government hand-outs. The Victorian Royal Commission
into Mental Health associated companies has ignored our pleas to abolish forced
psychiatry, ignored the impact on humans, wildlife and our environment. Our
government, puppeteered by big pharmaceutical lobbies and the exploitative mental
Hellth associated companies, wants to
tax us, to increase the violations, on us, our environment, platypus and other
river life. Stop psychiatrists from killing platypus and allow the twenty per
cent of Australians forced to take neurotoxins the #right2refuse psychiatrists.