Judging victims of torture as ‘burdens’

It decreases stress, to have someone on your side, validating your grief; someone who is able to stand up to those harming you & make them afraid.

Not wise to interact with erroneous accusers who victim-blame & nonsense 200+ years of psychiatry’s Government endorsed abuse of humans.

Victims of psychiatry are not burdens, psychiatrists are

If Robin Williams, before his death, told you how the SSRIs were making him feel suicidal & giving him Parkinsonian symptoms… what then?

If Norma Gene/ Marilyn Munroe had not been subjected to forced psychiatric 'medications' and arbitrary detention... and shamed into silence and suicide at what was done to her by psychiatrists.

If Silvia Plath had not been electrocuted & coerced/forced to take SSRIs that made her feel so suicidal she took her life...

Read more books by psych survivors & know...

• If you go to a doctor and tell them how to feel, they’ll diagnose you as fcksht and give you some poison to swallow.
• If you feel like telling a friend how you feel, they tell you to go get checked out by a doctor, as if you want that sleazy drug dealer checking you out!

It takes time to think around 200+ years of psychiatry's propaganda

• Initially, no one gets it, that psychiatry abuses people, enslaves them as specimens & does not help or heal.
• Initially, no, the population don't recognise psychiatry's propaganda, they instead vilify the victims of torture & laud psychiatrists.
• Initially no understanding – society blames the victims & celebrates the whitecoat torturers.

So, what to do about the ignorance? Keep questioning and putting our thoughts out to those who are permitted a platform to speak on behalf of the rest of the world and talk publically about our society's wrongs enough to create awareness. So, yet another question, from the persistent Ms Initially NO (that'd be me), to ABC Q&A to enable their panel to discuss this disgusting human rights abuse, that is forced & coerced torture of people in Australia. Inspired by another of ABC's programs You Cannot Ask that, which has NOT yet included a show for Survivors of Torture/ Psychiatric Regime Survivors. And, there's a reason for that... prejudice? discrimination? victim-blame? Don't touch that with a barge pole or you're labelled 'fcksht' and cannot get sponsorship? Oh! That's right anyone labelled and tortured by psychiatry doesn't have the right to speak out against their abusers, they're only allowed a platform, if they are willing to be a pet specimen for psychiatrists to display on a show about fcksht.

People generally think they can say anything they like to people who are/ have been tortured by the psychiatric regime. But, the truth is, they must stop these psychiatrisms, in the same way as they must stop racism. We really do not need people accusing us of being ‘incoherent’ or ‘crazy’. We know that's the bullying that got us tortured, and is especially insensitive to people who are still being tortured by psychiatry, or those who are being discriminated against for speaking out against psychiatry. We know it is a really subjective thing - perception - that we've been diagnosed as 'diseased' for. And people can attempt to nonsense and pooh-pooh anything they don't wish to allow a discussion of. And, we know they do, on a regular basis.

Psych survivors don't need to be told that we're an organised religion either - that's the propaganda coming out of people's mouths. How abusive are you, to throw that rubbish on us? Speaking out against the torture procedures that psychiatry inflicts on people 24/7 indefinitely, has nothing to do with religion. And, for a 4th generation atheist, like myself, it is just ridiculous.

Read our lips: we did not want to be tortured. Psychiatry tortured us. Psychiatry is currently torturing 1.5 billion people world-wide. Psychiatry's abuse has increased over the 208 years of its official existence so horrifically it mentally-ills quarter of the world's population. Please learn quickly to recognise who psych survivors are, people who have been put through government endorsed torture. Many, many people are suffering under psychiatry, hoping, one day they can be free from the torture of being an enslaved human laboratory specimen. But that cannot happen, until the public are aware of the civil rights movement, until people recognise we need to have absolute prohibition of forced treatment & commitment.

A question to the Q&A panel from a Survivor of Torture

From Q&A here 'I’m a psychiatric survivor. I’ve been subjected to torture via the psychiatric regime, endorsed by our government (this was for over 14 years). I want to know, what you think of me. Do you think that I’ve done something really, really wrong? Or do you think that I’m some ‘religious person’? How else do you want to judge me? Or do you think, that the psychiatric regime is really, really wrong and that something needs to be done about it?'

Article 15: Its Potential to End Impunity for Torture in Psychiatry

Posted on April 2, 2015  by  treatwebcastadmn 

CRPD 13: WNUSP side event on Article 15: Its Potential to End Impunity for Torture in Psychiatry

http://www.treatybodywebcast.org/crpd-13-wnusp-side-event-on-article-15-english-audio/

Rethinking criminal responsibility from a critical disability perspective: The abolition of insanity/incapacity acquittals and unfitness to plead, and beyond - Tina Minkowitz
read HERE

& don't forget my previous post for this child being tortured...

6 year old Florida child taken from her parents by police and forcibly held in psych ward.
http://ontariomove.blogspot.com.au/2011/04/6-year-old-florida-child-taken-from-her.html?spref=bl

World Wide protest against Electroshock May 16th

If you cannot attend the Melbourne protest against electroshock, please show your support. Share this link, and comment, give other people who can attend courage to be there. If you don't understand yet, you're not really thinking, definitely not caring enough to protect all those people coming here from war-torn countries, people suffering crisis, who will no doubt be subjected to psychiatric torture practices that will make their distress worse that make getting a job impossible, which slowly kills them. All the refugees trying to seek asylum in Australia, don't know that we have a regime that will persecute them here, if they're marginalised and suffering, they don't know about the horrific regime called psychiatry. It persecutes and tortures to death marginalised non-violent citizens under the guise of 'care' and 'medicine'. Psychiatry is using people as laboratory subjects has done so for so long, society has forgotten to notice. Spouting such propaganda, to smear innocent people with psychiatry advertises their wares and bewares to the mass media. People seeking asylum here didn't see that in the tourist campaigns. They’re in for more than one kind of

sh

ock

Long, long have been. And I know so many who have suffered this way and will not speak up for fear. Please don't refuse to attend, and don't tell me you're on our side, or I'll be concerned for your intellect.

In Victoria, Australia

Your tax goes on torturing 5700 unwilling innocent Victorians every year made 'involuntary' subject matter for white-coat thugs.

Stop torturing marginalised people! you silly tax payers: https://www.facebook.com/events/1589014468044096/

 

Psychiatry in jail!



Make amends,

Appeal to your better nature,

Give reparation,

Be considerate,

Recognise the law needs correction,

Because people need

Fair treatment,

Hearing,

Honesty,

Impartiality,

Justness

And reasonableness to heal.

Humanity’s crisis cannot be overcome

Without recompense,

Redress,

And review,

So human-rights will no longer

Be so horrifically abused.

Truth must be given

So injustice won’t persist.

And psychiatry needs a sentence

That will mean its regime is stopped.

Does anyone want to claim

That they're not aware of this?*

 

 

(*If you do, then please read the rest of my blog, have a look at some of the links I give. Familiarise yourself with the stories of people who have suffered, or, are currently suffering psychiatric abuse and recognise what it was that led you to think psychiatric abuse wasn't happening. When care isn't care and medicine isn't medicine, there is not only 'card stacking' happening, but 'glittering generalities', 'the lesser of two evils', 'name calling', 'pin-pointing the enemy', but also 'plain folks devices', 'simplification', heaps of 'testimonials' to get others on the 'bandwagon' and plenty of 'transfer'... Work it out, psychiatry needs to be in jail, it has made me and so many others suffer horribly. It is not a regime isolated to Australia. It is something that has infiltrated many, many countries. It claims to help, when it hinders, it claims to care when it makes people despair. Psychiatry forcefully drugs, which is assault in the second degree, but since it is repeats this on so many individuals over long periods of time, electrocutes and uses other invasive measures, I would term this ill treatment to be something far more malevolent and horrific.)

 

 

Suicidal from birth

There was story was about

A child whose parents

Made YouTube videos

Claiming the child was

‘Suicidal from birth’

Because the child

Was born with the umbilical

Cord around her neck, almost

Out of breath and blue,

Then fell out of the cradle,

Got into the dishwashing

Liquid, the dog’s do-do,

The medicine cabinet,

The power-points,

Ate dirt and mud and sand,

Ran onto the road,

Jumped out of a window,

Cut herself with glass,

Swallowed razor blades,

Crawled under an elephant,

Opened the car door,

While the vehicle was going,

And generally caused

Life-threatening havoc

That left her almost dead.

The parents questioned

Why the child was wanting

To kill herself so often

And the doctors said take

Such and such and such

So you don’t get stressed

And give her such and such

Or you’ll have to be cruel

And put her in a sand bag

So she can’t act upon her

Suicidal disease instincts

She inherited from you.

They took the drugs

And their baby took the drugs

And everything was peachy

After that, well, sort of better

Than it was, the parents said,

Thanks to the wondrous drugs.

This story was told again

And again many times

And was very popular

Moral tale for parents,

For a while, during the early

Millennium, but then

They were all druggies

Back then, in those days.

Weird, weird the times

That humanity goes through.


Please sign our petition to stop psychiatric abuse

click here to get notebook

Prescient psychiatry: ‘Symptoms of mental illness’ proving future criminal intent…

Innocent until proven guilty does not apply to those who’ve been diagnosed with ‘mental illness.’ You are guilty of potential of potential crimes, a psychiatrist suspects you might commit if they don’t chemically strait-jacket your body and mind into a ‘placid’ state. (The potential criminals who are in states of catatonia, are also suspects with negative symptoms of schizophrenia. I can’t see how it helps to use the same drugs on those with catatonia, as on those with mania, but apparently it’s all about prevention being better than cure and for the safety of society.)

                ‘Hearing voices’ is seen as a potentially criminal condition. Unusual states of consciousness psychiatrists believe have enough kinetic energy to be a potential danger to society. Psychiatrists have the prescience to know these things. You cannot expect the ordinary lay public to understand their reasoning. It’s all too complicated for them.

                Essentially though, psychiatrists couldn’t really convict a person of ‘potential future crimes,’ so, why are they allowed to not only imprison, but torture suspects of events only psychiatrists can predict could happen?

                Well, because the law in the state of Victoria, amongst other places, states that it is an incarceratable offence to ‘appear to have a mental illness’ and if you ‘appear to have a mental illness’ you are therefore potentially a danger to self or others and are in need of immediate treatment, according to prescient psychiatrists. And therefore you meet the criteria of sectioning. And therefore you will be forcefully drugged and if pregnant, electrocuted.

                What is psychiatry doing?! Well, they are punishing people they suspect will commit future crimes. Not because the patient has ‘made plans,’ but because the patient has ‘symptoms of mental illness,’ ie are hearing voices etc...

                Psychiatrists are punishing the people they suspect, in the same why they punish people who have committed violent crimes, who have ‘not been fit to stand trial due to mental illness.’

                Psychiatrists have a notion that a person with a ‘mental illness’ who commits a crime is the same as a person with a ‘mental illness’ who doesn’t commit a crime. Psychiatrists think that a person who is non-violent should be subjected to the same harsh chemical lobotomy as a person who is violent.

                Given that psychiatry has had a long history in aversion therapy (including King George III, who had porphyria causing him to ‘go mad’. His biological illness was not helped by the psychiatrists of the time using aversion therapy, blistering his calves and feet with acid. But the psychiatrists claimed this ‘cured’ him.) Given that aversion therapy is psychiatry’s main tool, (now in the form of neuroleptics and other drugs, seclusion and ECT) why do they think it works well as ‘treatment’ to give the same drugs to murderers, as to victims of assault, who are suffering repercussive mental health issues as a consequence?

                Now, murderers are put in separate, high security forensic psychiatric ‘hospitals,’ to victims of assault, who’ve committed no crimes, and are put in psychiatric 'hospitals'; but they are both subjected to the same torture regime by psychiatrists, if they’re deemed to have a ‘mental illness’ that ‘needs treatment’. And, according to psychiatrists all ‘mental illness’ needs their ‘treatment’ regimes.

                When are innocent victims of crime and other traumas, going to be allowed to decide what their treatment consists of? It is not okay to torture a person who happens to be ‘grieving for too long.’ It is not okay for a psychiatry to torture a victim of domestic violence. It is not okay to torture people full stop, particularly when the person is not in the least bit violent and has no need to be chemically restrained.

                Psychiatry has no place in ‘treating’ with aversion therapy innocent victims of crime, war and horrific circumstances, or even those who have been under too much pressure, just because they hear voices, are feeling suicidal, or are experiencing unusual states of consciousness. These people should not be retraumatised by psychiatry! They should be helped with compassion and understanding to gain a solid understanding of consensual reality, so they can understand why they are suffering and how they can break-through the internal crisis they are experiencing.

                My suggestion is that all psychiatrists get the sack and non-invasive therapies replace their cruel torturous regimes. It’d save a lot of money for the government. There wouldn’t be the $145,000 per year and up wage for the psychiatrists. Nor would there be the huge chemist bill of around $3600 per patient to add to that. Plus, people would actually move through their crisis, stabilise and get back to earning a living.

                Psychiatric drugs are ill treatment. Harming those already suffering does not help one bit. Forcing them to agree that the treatment is helping so they can be released from treatment orders, is just ridiculous.

                And, really, when you think about it, predicting future crimes should be evidence based not ‘symptom’ based.

                Work it out, hearing voices and having unusual states of consciousness is not a crime and should not be treated like it is something horrendously violent crime that needs immediate and life-time chemical restraints, that renders that person into no longer being able to think enough to heal, let alone be a contributing member to society. Plus the effects of these drugs not only damn a person’s intellect, they cause horrific physical disfiguring. This is just not okay. Please show some respect for victims of crime who develop ‘symptoms of mental illness’ and stop the horrific crimes against humanity psychiatrists are committing.

Make a New Year's resolution to end the psychiatric regime in 2013!
more protest Ts

In 2013 we must end the psychiatric regime

When an inhumane law needs to be changed you have to write the truth, rather than softening your life story into fiction. ‘Oversharing’ is necessary when people have literally been shut up and tortured for so long, all the while the public prejudice has continued to be so deeply ingrained by media propaganda.

Most Australian publishing houses still consider a first-hand experience of what psychiatrists term ‘mental illness’ to be a point of view that is unsellable. These publishers prefer the ‘authority’ of a medical practitioner over those with lived experience. And, they really don’t want to hear the truth, they want something that might get a little help from pharmaceutical sponsorship. It’s a horrible feed-back loop that is never ending in its destruction of people’s lives.

I’m sure the public doesn’t want to be inhumane, by allowing the continual torture of people who are in crisis, but they are because they do allow it. Some even condone it as necessary and back their arguments up with pseudo-science. They don’t even think about the many blogs that scream out how painful forced psychiatric treatments are to the person undergoing them. In the minds of people supporting psychiatry, they forget about the person who is made an involuntary patient and reduce them to something without sentience.

Think next time you nod your head and go along with what a psychiatrist is going to do to your unwilling relative, friend, or acquaintance, think about what actually makes sense. Listen if the person you are close to says, ‘I don’t want this.’ Understand why their reasons may be complicated into a parallel world of their psyche, which they may be expressing, more than the language of consensual reality. Don’t agree to the jargon of the psychiatrist more than the symbolic reasoning of the person you know. If you think about it, you should know who you’re with.

Most psychiatrists don’t help or heal, they police, by restraining and maiming. That’s what they’re taught to do. (Not that they’ll want deal with someone who is violent, no, that’s a police matter.) It’s only very odd psychiatrists that don’t order their staff to enforce retraining and maiming, drugging and disabling. Those psychiatrists who don’t, are not very well accepted by the psychiatric community.

The Mental Health Act, a part of Victorian law, backs up psychiatrists in my area. And all over the earth, there are similar government laws to allow psychiatrists to torture people who are having difficulties coping with traumatic events in their life. Why? Because the way these people are coping is outside the range of understood sense. But if, given time, and conversation, instead of drugs and other tortures, there are means through which seeming nonsense becomes obvious, as a symbolic parallel sense to the language of consensual reality.

Society understands that you have to learn gain a new understanding in order to  read writers such as Shakespeare, or learn subject matter such as physics. Even music and other art forms can be ‘acquired tastes’ and need to be understood through realisation and effort. People who have had a revolution inside themselves, need to be afforded the same respect.

So, why is it so difficult to understand that a person needs to be thought of as an individual that cannot fit the template of some other person? Yes, I know, friends think they ‘know’ their friends and when a friend goes into a ‘psychotic episode’ then the other friend freaks out because suddenly they don’t understand. They then accuse that there’s ‘something wrong’. Yes, miscommunication and suppression of traumatic events is what’s wrong.

So, what would be right? Allowing what’s been suppressed to be communicated in whatever medium it takes, that is non-violent. Make sense? I’d like to see health professionals do just that when a person is in crisis, rather than judge, accuse, drug and belittle. And the only way that is going to be the intervention for a crisis situation where a person has lost touch with consensual reality, is for the laws that say, ‘drug them’ and ‘ECT if they’re having a baby or not responsive to drugs’ to be changed.

‘What? She thinks she can change the law?’ I hear people say incredulously.

No, I don’t think I can change the law. I think the law must change, now, not sometime in the dim distant future.

‘What? But people who are mentally ill must be treated or they’ll be the death of us!’ I hear another in the crowd shout.

People must be treated with respect, given help and understanding as well as compassion, when they’ve drifted into a parallel sense. When people haven’t committed crimes, why on earth are they being accused like they have? Does the population think that all people diagnosed by psychiatrists are antisocial and dangerously so? They’re not, if you look at the stats on these things.

There’s more crowds of people that go on and pooh-pooh me, saying forced drugging is the ‘only viable means of combating these psychiatric diseases.’

Diseases? Yeah, psychiatrists are the disease. They attack the stressed, grieving and traumatised and make it almost impossible for these people to recover. They are an ugly blight on our society that needs to be cured. In 2013 we must end the psychiatric regime!

I think the best way of combating the disease of psychiatry is by recognising their treatment regime has no place in government law. I think, then, psychiatry won’t be such an aggressive disease and people can work out for themselves what is and isn’t healthy treatment.

notachemicalimbalance protest T-shirtts