Saturday, August 11, 2018

Killer whitecoat terms

Kristian Silva (paid by the tax payer's ABC) reports on how a workplace dispute leaves a man
  •         feeling persecuted, particularly after he seeks support
  •         feeling a failure & feeling humiliating misery
  •         Attempting suicide but not succeeding
  •         Unable to find a place to live
  •         Accused of being delusional
  •         Arbitrarily detained
  •      Subjected to torturous forced drugging 24/7 indefinitely under a public health order
  •          Resenting people who have a job, a home and whom can smile enough to seem happy

This man misdirects his anger at everyone except the psychiatrists who abused him the most, and, commits an unconscionable crime, of which there is no excuse.

Then, because he committed an horrific crime, psychiatrists are paid through tax-funds as ‘expert witnesses’ in the courts, to conflate his unconscionable crime with the psychiatrists’ pet diagnosis for indefinite arbitrary detention and torture.

The man was 'psycho' the psychiatrists say, in the ‘shitzo’ category the psychiatrists say (they might as well) as they continue - commonly called ‘mad’ the psychiatrists say. And don’t mention that’s the same thing that a child is accused of when the child tries to report a pedophile. The same thing women are accused of by psychiatrists, and condemned to when they try to talk or leave a violent domestic situation. The same thing that over 600,000 people in Australia this year have been labelled with. But the 600,000 people who have been arbitrarily detained and tortured under Australia’s Mental Health legislation, they have not committed unconscionable crimes. They haven’t committed ANY crimes.

Who commits the worst crimes?  Who murders the most? The psychiatrists – then they get up in the court and defend murderers! And get paid by the tax-payer to do that.

Murderers don’t need excuses. They did the crime, it was clearly not self-defence, they get the punishment – not more or less punishment than anyone else who does the same crime. There needs to be equality before the law.

Stop this outrageous eugenics term ‘mental fitness’ and ‘fitness to plead’ and try and stop attempting to excuse violence, in order to allow the whitecoats to exploit not only those who are convicted of crimes, but people attempting to report crimes, bullying, corruption, pollution… start thinking beyond the ridiculous propaganda the Australian Broadcasting Association serves, through Kristian Silva to continue bio-medico-exploitation.

Terms like ‘mentally sick’ used to talk up the idea of locking them up and throwing away the key, denying human rights on the basis of some psychiatrists accusation. Do people even know what goes under that umbrella so that psychiatrists can bring in a broad group of disenfranchised people whom they label, while the mainstream media dutifully reports the ‘unconscionable crimes’ and the insanity defence pleas – and ignores the fact that psychiatrists should not be allowed to forcibly exploit people for invasive, cruel, human research?

The idea of a person being ‘psychotic/insane’, such that they cannot ‘reason’ – is just meaningless jargon. What the hell do you mean? Those words are used by ‘professional psychiatrists’ to ramp up the dehumanising of people they persecute. Speak in terms that are meaningful, that make sense, that have logical reason that’s specific – rather than nebulous psychiatrists’ power-rort-babble-on. Recognise precisely what you meant to say when you uttered those whitecoat jargon tools for exploitation that throw people in to a bin labeling -
  •         You mean he was homeless and he was exposed to the elements?
  •          You mean he was scared that someone was going to report him to psychiatrists?
  •         You mean that he was terrified of arbitrary detention and torture under the Mental Health legislation and couldn’t tell anyone because they would report him?
  •       You mean his government was exploiting him and he was desperately trying to work out the reason he was being persecuted in this vile, cruel fashion and was grasping at any reason he could think to explain the destruction on his life under government legislation?
  •      You mean he did an unconscionable crime?

Which? What?

Learn to reason better than people who are paid to write articles that are funded by pharma. Learn to recognise the whitecoat propaganda that whites out the truth and replaces it with an advertising agenda. And remember no one deserves to be subjected forcibly to invasive cruel scientific-medical research, or arbitrary detention. And, when people are subjected to these violations – they rightly feel they are being persecuted by their government, and society that does nothing to stop them being violated behind whitecoat closed doors. Exploitation is violence.

Equality before the law, equal recognition before the law means that there should be no such Mental Health Court. That anyone who does an unconscionable crime, has the right to plead self-defense, but no such right to bring in those who were violating them, as experts, rather they should be co-accused, that’s what psychiatrists should be, accused of violating the person’s human rights before the person did the unconscionable crime, never accused of not violating the person’s human rights enough (which is what mainstream media wants to imply with their reinforcing of inequality before the law, in that people deemed unfit by a psychiatrist can be arbitrarily detained and tortured 24/7 indefinitely for the purpose of lucrative, cruel human research.)

There are many people whose lives are ruined by forced psychiatry. Killing and maiming people and calling it care is just really stupid propaganda. Conflating those who do unconscionable crimes, with everyone who is homeless – that would be outrageous – but when people conflate nebulous terms psychiatrists use to order exploitation of a disenfranchised person - conflate that accusation by a psychiatrist with an unconscionable crime - people forget that psychiatrists are criminals, their whole duty is to violate and exploit and get paid handsomely by the government, that also gets a cut of the human research profits.

To seed the idea that people labelled with the term ‘shitzo’ or ‘psycho’ by a psychiatrist (well, pretty much that) – have a disease that will mean they will commit an unconscionable crime, is just ridiculous, because ‘a disease’ needs proof to exist, or, it’s just a conspiracy theory, and prescience isn’t really applicable to scientific method, it’s something people who dapple in the supernatural are into. So, what the hell is this shit that propagates these stupid ideas doing in the tax-payer funded ABC? Shouldn’t that kind of shit be propagated by commercial interests that twist things into perverse advertising purposes so they can keep their business running? People know not to trust commerce, but they think their government should somehow be beyond the strings of commerce, and its TV network reporting shouldn’t propagate advertisements that push exploitation… which is silly because it is the government legislation that allows the worst kinds of exploitation now, and historically, and the worst kinds of propaganda.

Have a look at some vintage propaganda from 1918, and think about how little the government’s cruel exploitation has changed in 100 years. The propaganda merely uses different language and symbology – and though people find the propaganda of 1918 ridiculous now – how many people found the propaganda of 1918 ridiculous, when they were living in that era? How long did it take people to recognise that they were being coersively-controlled by propaganda? How long did it take people to recognise the people being violated in 1918 and victim-blamed were not the criminals, but were being set up as such? Let’s just partially answer that with – people have still not fully recognised the eugenics propaganda of 1918 in 2018, but they must. It’s been going on 100 years too long.

Eugenics is all about grouping people into categories, looking at people in a way that dehumanises them into something disgusting, debasing and abusive - so that a sector of the population can be forcibly condemned to arbitrary detention & medical/ scientific experimentation.

Psychiatrists and neuro-psychologists and other whitecoats involved in forcibly and coersively experimenting on people in an invasive cruel way are the disgusting core of eugenics. 

The regime has not ended, the forced human experimentation continues to expand unabated, human rights denied as people are maimed and murdered because psychiatrists point at us and accuse of us with some nebulous jargon.

References on eugenics & propaganda

Sunday, July 29, 2018

Peerly Human: What It's Like to Be a Mother Watching Your Son De...

Peerly Human: What It's Like to Be a Mother Watching Your Son De...:                                   After psychiatry/ before drugs and psychiatry.  2017. / 2015.                                   Thi...

Wednesday, July 18, 2018

You sound whitecoat

When a star checks herself into being a whitecoat spruiker. Saying she’s ‘dedicated herself to increasing awareness of mental health’, and ‘empoweringpeople to recognise when it’s time to seek help’  go ask your doctor spiel. That’s when I think – you ugly whitecoats’ fart.

Advocating for whom? For the whitecoat exploiters!

Choke on your ‘betterment of those in need’ Michelle Williams! What planet are you on?

Millions of people are being tortured to death by psychiatrists. Millions die every year worldwide because of forced and coerced psychiatry. 

You feeling tired of all those gigs? You got burn out? Just say so. Of course it’s tiring. Your manager is a bloody whip on you, but you do have the choice to say yes or no, to his demands.

Garth Daniels and millions of other victims of psychiatrists do not have that choice, nor are they being paid ANYTHING, to be violently and cruelly exploited by psychiatrists, whitecoat researchers and their government that legislates forced psychiatry.

Michelle, if you dropped the tours because of fatigue and burnout, that wouldn’t get any kind of payment, I know, but you’ll never be homeless or without offers of payment for your music and other talents. So, what's the big deal? Are you that greedy? Or just so tired you're just going along with what everyone says, like actors do, because that's what they're paid to do, cover up for the scum who make money from violations so disgusting, that no one wants to talk about how stinking awful it is, in case they get told to shut up and it isn't happening, then no press will cover the advertising of their gigs. The same thing was done for the pedophiles, please don't continue down this track, it's disgusting.

It is a low stoop to spruik for whitecoats, and act like you’re a disciple of theirs. Why didn’t you just go on a nice retreat? Surely there’s somewhere you can get away from prying eyes, other than putting yourself in a whitecoat detention centre!

Now you’ll just sound whitecoat when you sing. How awful. No one wants to hear a tone of voice that  sings of  backing world-wide torture of the disenfranchised.

If you spruik for the whitecoats, though, well… that’s a big fat pay out. So, you want to take a break from the exhausting tour – and get a lucrative payout from the evil whitecoats that violently and cruelly exploit people for human research, by force, worldwide, and say that the nicety they treat you with, as a celebrity, is what they treat the disenfranchised with when they drag them off and torture them 24/7 indefinitely for the rest of their lives. Get stuffed Michelle,  millions of people worldwide are suffering more violence from whitecoats now because you back these ugly violent cruel monsters that want to rule the world. Their mental health scams, are violent exploitation disguised as benevolence.

You have an option, once you're over your exhaustion - and that's to speak out against psychiatrists and what they do to us. Advocate for absolute prohibition of forced treatment and commitment worldwide. Because no one wants to be a laboratory specimen, but that's what a Public Health Order/ Mental Health legislation subjects people to - violent, cruel exploitation. The whitecoat violators must be stopped, NEVER spruiked for.


‘In the statement that Williams shared on Tuesday, she wrote, “For years I have dedicated myself to increasing awareness of mental health and empowering people to recognize when it’s time to seek help, support and guidance from those that love and care for your wellbeing. “Today I proudly, happily and healthily stand here as someone who will continue to always lead by example as I tirelessly advocate for the betterment of those in need.” Many fans of the singer have commented on her Instagram post in support, including her former bandmate Beyoncé’s mother, Tina Knowles, who wrote, “Keep being a warrior and an advocate for you. I love and support you with all my being.”’-

Tuesday, July 3, 2018

Equal Recognition before the Law?

This is what the public think all people subjected to forced psychiatry are – a person using Mental Health legislation to get a lighter sentence, and they think forced psychiatry is talk-therapy, with some feel-good drugs:
  1. ‘Brennan had been diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, social dysfunction, anxiety and depression. Judge Duncan Allen described the case as “very serious offending with tragic consequences” but one with compelling and mitigating circumstances. He detailed Brennan’s history of mental illness and drug addiction following a young adulthood of abuse, “torment”, depressive illness and suicidal ideation. Judge Allen said he needed to deter “others from driving like maniacs on the road, like you did”. But he added, “the depth of your genuine and true remorse and contrition is so powerful”, adding Brennan would not receive adequate psychiatric care in jail and her condition would deteriorate.’
The public are angry that this woman, who killed a man, while driving under the influence of an illegal drug, may end up only serving 3 years, of the 6 years she’s been sentenced. They think stuff this woman trying to excuse her crimes. They think stuff all those ‘mentally ill’ people. And those protesting being violated by psychiatrists.

  1. ‘At a hearing two weeks ago Wilson’s defence team argued imprisonment could worsen Wilson’s many chronic illnesses, that included diabetes, heart and Alzheimers disease and depression, and may put him at risk of assault from fellow inmates.’

Is this Equality before the Law? No. Considering the victims of paedophiles are still being subjected to arbitrary detention, and forced psychiatry (which by the way is not feel good drugs, it’s horrible debilitating, destructive disabling, unwanted drugs, electrocution, isolation, vilification, shackling, and surgical procedures designed to cause lesions on the brain.

Conflating someone who covered up paedophilia, like Archbishop Wilson, with someone who was subjected to that violence when they were a child – that’s what psychiatrists do under Mental Health legislation, such as the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 do. Only, psychiatrists don’t treat the Wilson’s of this world to the violence they treat the victims of Wilson’s paedophilia cover-up.

People who started off in the psychiatric system because their circle of friends/ family thought they needed assistance to talk things through, or wean off a drug like marijuana, or because of a reaction to racism, or other vilification, a reaction that wasn’t a criminal offense, but concerned people because it ‘sounded strange’… for attempting to report violence that happened to you, for being upset, for attempting to talk about EMF/ EMR or chemical pollution, for being considered too thin… this group of people get violently exploited, shut up and shut down. They're not allowed to even communicate the horror they're being subjected to, as being horrific without being labelled 'non-compliant' and subjected to worse abuses.

Psychiatry attempts to confuse everything by giving excuses to the scum like Archbishop Wilson, and accuse people who are upset by people like Wilson, of having the same mentality as Archbishop Wilson when they have NOT done anything criminal – so psychiatrists can procure victims for vile, cruel lucrative human experimentation – and let those high up scum who cover-up the whitecoat crimes to get off freely and easily.

Garth Daniels - the public don't recognise the reality of his situation– he is being unlawfully detained. 
20 years of his life, taken into arbitrary detention while psychiatrists make use of him as a laboratory specimen. For what? Because that’s the why Australian legislation is?
Why are people not standing in the street protesting?!

Garth Daniels, who, has not committed any crime, yet is not only subjected to the most severely destructive abuses of forced psychiatry for 20 years. He is then, while being detained and tortured under the unlawful Mental Health legislation, charged with assault for fighting back physically while nurses and guards were shackling him and forcing drugs into his body that he clearly, said he did not consent to, verbally, every time he was being attacked by these nurses doing the bidding of psychiatrists, and in writing to the United Nations CRPD committee.
Came and took him in his prime
Forced him to endure their poison
Electrocuted him, tied him up
And told him they wouldn’t stop
Until he submitted to their needs,
That he must agree with their accusations
And take the poisons willingly.
Strong and defiant
He would not play their evil game.
Forced medicine is unlawful, it does not matter what a person is accused of doing, forced medical treatments and scientific research are not permissible by force to those who do not consent, yet they are being forced systematically in Australia and for massive profits. So, here’s Garth Daniels, then charged with assault for fighting back, yet denied the legal capacity to plead self-defence. Not having the right to refuse violent, cruel, inhuman treatment psychiatrists in this era labeled ‘medicine’ while they conduct their human research.

Psychiatrists apparently even refused to bring his body in the court, for a Habeas Corpus writ.

Garth is still in indefinite detention being subjected to the most massive, soul destroying, painful doses of neuroleptics – because he says he does not consent to the psychiatrists’ demands, and that he will not take the neuroleptics willingly. Garth is being subjected to the most horrific isolation, while deprived of his liberty without being given equal recognition before the law, because he doesn’t agree to be a laboratory specimen, he doesn’t agree torture and arbitrary detention is good for him.

FOR WHAT reason is this violence being inflicted on Garth Daniels?
For fighting back against torturers? For saying ‘no’ he will not go quietly and be assaulted and battered? then say he’s okay with that? No one is meant to be okay with that kind of abuse!

To add insult to injury his visitors are told that they’re not allowed to speak another language than English, even when they were speaking English. And, really is that something that should be permissible in Australia? No way! that's racist to demand people speak English only.

But to Gaslight the situation and say that people must speak English when communicating with their loved one who is deprived of liberty by medico-political exploiters legislating for exploitation, and even when they were speaking English escort them away so the Garth is further isolated! They just have way too much power over what is real and what is not, way to much power to breach boundaries decent societies consider horrifically unethical.

Unfortunately, Garth is not alone, he’s among many millions of victims of psychiatrists, though most do not have a family who understands how-to stand up to authority gone wrong. Most people in Australia are too afraid of going against medico-eugenics propaganda that has its fingers in the government pie. Most people in Australia are too indoctrinated by that propaganda, they have the wool firmly pulled over their eyes and trust that whitecoats know ‘better’ than the person they know best.

That's when the Compulsory Patient breaks under torture, and gets called a 'consumer', when they don't have the social support to keep up their morale, and think their only option is to play the game, which is both horribly degrading, Gaslighting, and indoctrinating to spend years reiterating what the psychiatrists want their victims to say. 

Most of all, the population is indoctrinated into thinking that the Victims of Psychiatrists, don’t exist, and that Mental Health Acts are ‘caring’ and the population, when they think of a person subjected to forced psychiatry they think of people, who are likely to never be subjected to forced psychiatry, or even jail, yet they’ll use the medicalisation in court to get them home detention, or something like. Those people who do horrific crimes – like the Archbishop Philip Wilson, who because of they have done evil all their life and covered up for evil, their scum has floated to the top of the power structure. And they don’t even get detained, let alone shackled, isolated, injected with neuroleptics, nor even put in a prison.

No one wants to consume psychiatry's array of abuses. 
No one wants to be exploited as a laboratory specimen in the cruel, horrific way that psychiatrists do.

Understandably someone who has done something horrible, the public want justice. But - when are the public going to start looking to stop those in power, the psychiatrists from doing horrible, violence, lucrative exploitation to people like Garth Daniels, then vilifying the victim by pronouncing that they 'don't know what he might do' when he hasn't done anything more than fight back a little when cornered by those who were and are still torturing him to death.

Would you fight back against torturers? Would you do it by instinct? or because you thought there was a chance you might get free? Or would you have extraordinary control in a horrendously violent situation, and be passively resisting and still called a 'danger' and 'aggressive' because you told the psychiatrists and nurses, 'I do not consent to the drugs you demand I take.' Or would you, just give in straight away, because psychiatrists are an authority?

Not much choice is there? That's because the Mental Health legislation in Australia is legislation dating back to the eugenics era, where putting in exploitative, nebulous policy to violently abuse people via lucrative means, was always something the population would agree to, as long as it was dressed up royally by 'appointed experts' who were touted as 'benevolent' when they were being their most violent.

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

Exploiting deaths from poisoning for whitecoat propaganda

A liturgy of whitecoat propaganda hitting the media in the form of articles, attempting to purport with alliteration that EVERYONE, even those who are rich need to pay psychiatrists for… having their buttons depressed.

Well who is depressing their buttons so that they need to be ‘reset’ by psychiatrists, who actually have the gall to compare people to machines and propagate lies about ‘chemical imbalances’ and electrocution resetting of human thinking.
Humans are not your modem. Get away from us you ugly whitecoats that want to procure more specimens for human experimentation. Of course you want high profile people who are desperate and gullible enough to fall for your rubbish. If they commit one crime, you can procure them for your benevolent dictatorship of the world, get them for life for promoting your products.
Yes, people who are considered ‘successful’ and ‘wealthy’ do suicide, through guilt, abuse, or bullying. And of course in the fashion world some fashion designers feel guilty about their sweatshops and pollution. As whitecoats and journalists should feel guilty from their profits from exploiting millions of people forcibly for human experimentation under Mental Health Legislation.

And, suicide isn’t always suicide. That’s the main reason why suicide is an issue, people want to know if it actually was done by the person, or if the person was being abused by those around them, or if they were actually murdered.

When I look at recent pictures of Kate Spade, I see something most people don’t recognise – psychiatric drugs. I can tell by the way they pull at the muscles of the face, and dull the eyes. I should know, I was subjected to them by forced for 14 years. Psychiatric drugs are painful and delibilitating. For people who are subjected to chemicals in fabric dyes andstiffeners, Personal Products, cleaning products and grow sensitive to thesechemicals – these psychiatric drugs have an even more devastating effect.

Where is the actual thing that is the disease? Years and years of government grants to find this category of ‘disease’ and nothing, nothing, nothing. Time to stop donating money to whitecoats so they can bribe the media and political parties for more money to tell the population they have fictional diseases. Being bullied, or grieving is not a disease you ugly whitecoat pricks.

When journalists want to call the effects of psychiatric drugs the ‘disease of depression’, you know they’re paid propaganda. Those who listen to this propaganda are either desperate, bullied, have no choice, or dullards who venerate whitecoats like psychiatrists' bollocks is golden.

You know what psychiatric drugs do to people? Cause them to suicide, because the drugs are poison. It’s on all the drug websites, because when the chemicals were tested on people, for marketing purposes, they found a number of people took their lives due to the effects. And poisoning doesn’t discriminate, if you have money or no money, being poisoned isn’t fun. Plus it’s also disorientating, confusing – especially when you’re surrounded by people who are being paid to propagate lies, paid a lot of money to scam the public about poisonous whitecoat products being ‘healthy.’ It's a major scam and very depressing for the people who fall for it.

Cesspit they are, their ‘successful drugs’ forced on unwilling people, their ‘popular drugs’ forced on unwilling people. Never a mention of how those forced and coerced drugs caused a person to die, that would be unprofitable for the mainstream-media to report. You utter sucks who fall for it, when you should be suing the whitecoats, to stop the vile poisons everyone has to put up with in the air, the vile drugs forced on people through unlawful Public Health Orders. Get with it, stop propagating lies you ugly whitecoats who used to be called leach-men/ women, and still should. You ugly whitecoats - you're parasites.

Sunday, June 3, 2018

Poisoned person does unconscionable crimes

The way the public sees all Compulsory Patients, is in the manner of the way this 20-year-old man is described as having done unconscionable crimes. As not having the capacity to stand trial and therefore being subjected to a Public Health Order, for his crime.
Given the man was marginalised and exploited by psychiatrists, has committed horrific violence, he should be held accountable for his crimes, instead he’s being denied capacity to stand trial. There should be Equality before the Law. That the grandparents were potentially going to call the Crisis Assessment Treatment Team on him and have him made a Compulsory Patient, is likely. So, instead of being totally disempowered by others, he attacked and had power over others’ lives, however fleetingly.
Most people who are sectioned as Compulsory Patients, don’t commit unconscionable crimes, or any crime at all, they usually haven’t ever had power over anyone, and experience horrific violence at the hands of community and the psychiatrists who have legislative power to make them Compulsory Patients.
No one should be subjected to forced psychiatry, it is unlawful that Australia forces chemicals and procedures on anyone. Detention should not be arbitrary, yet this unlawful legislation is what is written into every State/ Territory.

Under the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 –  
"compulsory patient" means a person who is subject to—
        (a)     an Assessment Order; or
        (b)     a Court Assessment Order; or
        (c)     a Temporary Treatment Order; or
        (d)     a Treatment Order;
"consent", in relation to health information, has the same meaning as it has in section 3(1) of the Health Records Act 2001 ;

There are people who are Compulsory Patients that have done nothing more than cry in the corner and refuse to go with a psychiatrist. Then there are people that have committed offenses that wouldn’t normally result in a jail term. Then, rarely, there are people that do what the 20-year old described in the News Daily article did, something unconscionable and violent. What is common to all the people who are Compulsory Patients – is that they do not want psychiatrists treating them, because what psychiatrists do to people is one of the most unconscionable crimes in the world – forcibly experimenting on humans with cruel, inhuman, degrading intrusive chemicals, procedures that maim and kill them.
Forced neuroleptics cause distress; these drugs are dangerous, they cause people to be upset and angry. Neuroleptics are horrible poisons, with the most horrible effects. No one chooses to take neuroleptics, because they don’t help with anything, they destroy ability, livelihood, and health.
A person’s life to end up being that of a laboratory specimen, and the governing State, enforcing this with a Public Health Order, usually in the form of a Mental Health Act – is devastating. Being tortured makes anyone angry, upset, disabled… these forced treatments cause a massive death rate each year. They do not ‘alleviate suffering’.
When a person stops taking the neuroleptics, depending if pills or depot (the depot stays in the body for another 9 months at least, it is a long acting neuroleptic), the withdrawal from the drug means the person’s nervous system becomes free from being shut down. The bodily compensation or attempts to combat the neurotoxin may continue to operate, and that will mean a period of adjustment, where a person usually needs support in reminding them they’re withdrawing.
Emotionally, one thing a person or animal does when free from torture, is want to stop ever being tortured again, and understandably does not want to be threatened with torture again, does want to do everything possible to stop being tortured again. Neuroleptics are a horrific torture. How does one stop a government legislating such a torture? How does one stop friends and family from dobbing them into the torturers?
We live in a society gone wrong. A society that places torturing psychiatrists on a wage higher than nearly anyone else in the country. A society that allows for legislation that forcibly exploits people for vile, cruel human experimentation, of which psychiatrists and a coterie of investors profit, while the people forcibly exploited under Public Health Orders, are used like animals are in laboratories, as a piece of laboratory equipment, their human voice silenced, as though the person were not able to communicate, their autonomy taken away, their body violently assaulted. Yet they’re not even able to say this is assault and battery, if they do, higher doses and other painful procedures, isolation, deprivation is inflicted. If the person is not a forensic patient, they are arbitrarily detained and tortured until they submit to all the psychiatrist demands, even though the reality is that the treatments don’t assist in any way with anything but the psychiatrists’ funding, that the treatments cause horrific suffering and damage to the person is well known, by those who have been behind these whitecoat closed-doors.
The UN CRPD committee has asked Australia to end forced psychiatry, and remove the legislation that commits this violation.
Yet State/ Territories have done nothing to remove forced psychiatry from their legislation. They have increased their human research budget, and even paid for propaganda to make it look like all human research is voluntary and helpful.
What psychiatrists do is bloody murder.
Is the psychiatrist going to be held to account though? For causing a person such distress? No, because there’s a get-out-of-jail-free clause written into the legislation for the authorised – treating psychiatrist.
In Good Faith rule
77           Urgent medical treatment
s. 77
                (1)           A health practitioner may perform medical treatment on a patient without obtaining the informed consent of the patient or a person specified in section 75 if the health practitioner is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the medical treatment is necessary, as a matter of urgency—
                (a)           to save the patient's life; or
                (b)           to prevent serious damage to the patient's health; or
                (c)           to prevent the patient from suffering or continuing to suffer significant pain or distress.
                (2)           A health practitioner who, in good faith, carries out, or supervises the carrying out, of medical treatment in the belief on reasonable grounds that the requirements of this section have been complied with is not—
                (a)           guilty of assault or battery; or
                (b)           guilty of professional misconduct or unprofessional conduct; or
                (c)           liable in any civil proceedings for assault or battery.
                (3)           Nothing in this section affects any duty of care owed by a health practitioner to a patient.
231         Protection from liability
                (1)           The Commissioner is not personally liable for any thing done or omitted to be done in good faith—
                (a)           in the exercise of a power or the performance of a function under this Act; or
                (b)           in the reasonable belief that the act or omission was in the exercise of a power or the performance of a function under this Act.
                (2)           Any liability resulting from an act or omission that, but for subsection (1), would attach to the Commissioner attaches instead to the State.

Is the body corporate (the Crown, in this case NSW) going to be held accountable for legislating the poisoning and desperation of this man persecuted by psychiatrists and his community through legislation – that caused him to be so desperate he decided that if everyone was going to endorse the harming of him, he was going to harm them back?

·         Victorian Mental Health Act 2014

Friday, June 1, 2018

Mental Health objectives & principals for procuring human research specimens

Legislation that declares ‘To provide’ for:

  • Unlawful forced assessment and forced treatment
  • Least obstructive to the human researchers possible, with the least possible exposure of restrictions on human rights and human dignity
  • To protect whitecoat vested interests in human research, enable and support psychiatrists:
    • to make, or participate in, decisions about their assessment, treatment and recovery of funds; and
    • to exercise their rights under this Act
  • to provide oversight and safeguards in relation to the assessment of persons who appear to be procurable for human research specimens
  • to promote the recovery of funds for research specimen treatment regimes
  • to ensure that persons who are assessed and treated under this Act are informed of their need to submit to treatments without resistance under this Act;
  • to indoctrinate the role of carers in reinforcing the assessment, treatment and fundraising for human research.

Such is the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 - unlawful statute law, made by parliament, it can be repealed by parliament. Recognise the violence under this legislation that, calls deliberate poisoning, causing of lesions and seizures to be 'treatment'. 

According to the misogynist MP Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt, repealing this legislation must be done by the State of Victoria.
'Under the Australian Constitution, state governments are responsible for the delivery of specialised public mental health services in Australia. Each state and territory has developed its own legislation on how to ensure the safety and welfare of people with mental illness, including the use of involuntary assessment and treatment. While the Commonwealth continues have an active interest in this area it cannot intervene in state legislation on mental health.' 

Please work towards getting this legislation that provides for forced psychiatry to be abolished. Make your own petition and sign current Victorian e-petitions 63 & 67.