Wednesday, June 6, 2018

Exploiting deaths from poisoning for whitecoat propaganda

A liturgy of whitecoat propaganda hitting the media in the form of articles, attempting to purport with alliteration that EVERYONE, even those who are rich need to pay psychiatrists for… having their buttons depressed.

Well who is depressing their buttons so that they need to be ‘reset’ by psychiatrists, who actually have the gall to compare people to machines and propagate lies about ‘chemical imbalances’ and electrocution resetting of human thinking.
Humans are not your modem. Get away from us you ugly whitecoats that want to procure more specimens for human experimentation. Of course you want high profile people who are desperate and gullible enough to fall for your rubbish. If they commit one crime, you can procure them for your benevolent dictatorship of the world, get them for life for promoting your products.
Yes, people who are considered ‘successful’ and ‘wealthy’ do suicide, through guilt, abuse, or bullying. And of course in the fashion world some fashion designers feel guilty about their sweatshops and pollution. As whitecoats and journalists should feel guilty from their profits from exploiting millions of people forcibly for human experimentation under Mental Health Legislation.

And, suicide isn’t always suicide. That’s the main reason why suicide is an issue, people want to know if it actually was done by the person, or if the person was being abused by those around them, or if they were actually murdered.

When I look at recent pictures of Kate Spade, I see something most people don’t recognise – psychiatric drugs. I can tell by the way they pull at the muscles of the face, and dull the eyes. I should know, I was subjected to them by forced for 14 years. Psychiatric drugs are painful and delibilitating. For people who are subjected to chemicals in fabric dyes andstiffeners, Personal Products, cleaning products and grow sensitive to thesechemicals – these psychiatric drugs have an even more devastating effect.

Where is the actual thing that is the disease? Years and years of government grants to find this category of ‘disease’ and nothing, nothing, nothing. Time to stop donating money to whitecoats so they can bribe the media and political parties for more money to tell the population they have fictional diseases. Being bullied, or grieving is not a disease you ugly whitecoat pricks.

When journalists want to call the effects of psychiatric drugs the ‘disease of depression’, you know they’re paid propaganda. Those who listen to this propaganda are either desperate, bullied, have no choice, or dullards who venerate whitecoats like psychiatrists' bollocks is golden.

You know what psychiatric drugs do to people? Cause them to suicide, because the drugs are poison. It’s on all the drug websites, because when the chemicals were tested on people, for marketing purposes, they found a number of people took their lives due to the effects. And poisoning doesn’t discriminate, if you have money or no money, being poisoned isn’t fun. Plus it’s also disorientating, confusing – especially when you’re surrounded by people who are being paid to propagate lies, paid a lot of money to scam the public about poisonous whitecoat products being ‘healthy.’ It's a major scam and very depressing for the people who fall for it.

Cesspit they are, their ‘successful drugs’ forced on unwilling people, their ‘popular drugs’ forced on unwilling people. Never a mention of how those forced and coerced drugs caused a person to die, that would be unprofitable for the mainstream-media to report. You utter sucks who fall for it, when you should be suing the whitecoats, to stop the vile poisons everyone has to put up with in the air, the vile drugs forced on people through unlawful Public Health Orders. Get with it, stop propagating lies you ugly whitecoats who used to be called leach-men/ women, and still should. You ugly whitecoats - you're parasites.

Sunday, June 3, 2018

Poisoned person does unconscionable crimes

The way the public sees all Compulsory Patients, is in the manner of the way this 20-year-old man is described as having done unconscionable crimes. As not having the capacity to stand trial and therefore being subjected to a Public Health Order, for his crime.
Given the man was marginalised and exploited by psychiatrists, has committed horrific violence, he should be held accountable for his crimes, instead he’s being denied capacity to stand trial. There should be Equality before the Law. That the grandparents were potentially going to call the Crisis Assessment Treatment Team on him and have him made a Compulsory Patient, is likely. So, instead of being totally disempowered by others, he attacked and had power over others’ lives, however fleetingly.
Most people who are sectioned as Compulsory Patients, don’t commit unconscionable crimes, or any crime at all, they usually haven’t ever had power over anyone, and experience horrific violence at the hands of community and the psychiatrists who have legislative power to make them Compulsory Patients.
No one should be subjected to forced psychiatry, it is unlawful that Australia forces chemicals and procedures on anyone. Detention should not be arbitrary, yet this unlawful legislation is what is written into every State/ Territory.

Under the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 –  
"compulsory patient" means a person who is subject to—
        (a)     an Assessment Order; or
        (b)     a Court Assessment Order; or
        (c)     a Temporary Treatment Order; or
        (d)     a Treatment Order;
"consent", in relation to health information, has the same meaning as it has in section 3(1) of the Health Records Act 2001 ;

There are people who are Compulsory Patients that have done nothing more than cry in the corner and refuse to go with a psychiatrist. Then there are people that have committed offenses that wouldn’t normally result in a jail term. Then, rarely, there are people that do what the 20-year old described in the News Daily article did, something unconscionable and violent. What is common to all the people who are Compulsory Patients – is that they do not want psychiatrists treating them, because what psychiatrists do to people is one of the most unconscionable crimes in the world – forcibly experimenting on humans with cruel, inhuman, degrading intrusive chemicals, procedures that maim and kill them.
Forced neuroleptics cause distress; these drugs are dangerous, they cause people to be upset and angry. Neuroleptics are horrible poisons, with the most horrible effects. No one chooses to take neuroleptics, because they don’t help with anything, they destroy ability, livelihood, and health.
A person’s life to end up being that of a laboratory specimen, and the governing State, enforcing this with a Public Health Order, usually in the form of a Mental Health Act – is devastating. Being tortured makes anyone angry, upset, disabled… these forced treatments cause a massive death rate each year. They do not ‘alleviate suffering’.
When a person stops taking the neuroleptics, depending if pills or depot (the depot stays in the body for another 9 months at least, it is a long acting neuroleptic), the withdrawal from the drug means the person’s nervous system becomes free from being shut down. The bodily compensation or attempts to combat the neurotoxin may continue to operate, and that will mean a period of adjustment, where a person usually needs support in reminding them they’re withdrawing.
Emotionally, one thing a person or animal does when free from torture, is want to stop ever being tortured again, and understandably does not want to be threatened with torture again, does want to do everything possible to stop being tortured again. Neuroleptics are a horrific torture. How does one stop a government legislating such a torture? How does one stop friends and family from dobbing them into the torturers?
We live in a society gone wrong. A society that places torturing psychiatrists on a wage higher than nearly anyone else in the country. A society that allows for legislation that forcibly exploits people for vile, cruel human experimentation, of which psychiatrists and a coterie of investors profit, while the people forcibly exploited under Public Health Orders, are used like animals are in laboratories, as a piece of laboratory equipment, their human voice silenced, as though the person were not able to communicate, their autonomy taken away, their body violently assaulted. Yet they’re not even able to say this is assault and battery, if they do, higher doses and other painful procedures, isolation, deprivation is inflicted. If the person is not a forensic patient, they are arbitrarily detained and tortured until they submit to all the psychiatrist demands, even though the reality is that the treatments don’t assist in any way with anything but the psychiatrists’ funding, that the treatments cause horrific suffering and damage to the person is well known, by those who have been behind these whitecoat closed-doors.
The UN CRPD committee has asked Australia to end forced psychiatry, and remove the legislation that commits this violation.
Yet State/ Territories have done nothing to remove forced psychiatry from their legislation. They have increased their human research budget, and even paid for propaganda to make it look like all human research is voluntary and helpful.
What psychiatrists do is bloody murder.
Is the psychiatrist going to be held to account though? For causing a person such distress? No, because there’s a get-out-of-jail-free clause written into the legislation for the authorised – treating psychiatrist.
In Good Faith rule
77           Urgent medical treatment
s. 77
                (1)           A health practitioner may perform medical treatment on a patient without obtaining the informed consent of the patient or a person specified in section 75 if the health practitioner is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the medical treatment is necessary, as a matter of urgency—
                (a)           to save the patient's life; or
                (b)           to prevent serious damage to the patient's health; or
                (c)           to prevent the patient from suffering or continuing to suffer significant pain or distress.
                (2)           A health practitioner who, in good faith, carries out, or supervises the carrying out, of medical treatment in the belief on reasonable grounds that the requirements of this section have been complied with is not—
                (a)           guilty of assault or battery; or
                (b)           guilty of professional misconduct or unprofessional conduct; or
                (c)           liable in any civil proceedings for assault or battery.
                (3)           Nothing in this section affects any duty of care owed by a health practitioner to a patient.
231         Protection from liability
                (1)           The Commissioner is not personally liable for any thing done or omitted to be done in good faith—
                (a)           in the exercise of a power or the performance of a function under this Act; or
                (b)           in the reasonable belief that the act or omission was in the exercise of a power or the performance of a function under this Act.
                (2)           Any liability resulting from an act or omission that, but for subsection (1), would attach to the Commissioner attaches instead to the State.

Is the body corporate (the Crown, in this case NSW) going to be held accountable for legislating the poisoning and desperation of this man persecuted by psychiatrists and his community through legislation – that caused him to be so desperate he decided that if everyone was going to endorse the harming of him, he was going to harm them back?

·         Victorian Mental Health Act 2014

Friday, June 1, 2018

Mental Health objectives & principals for procuring human research specimens

Legislation that declares ‘To provide’ for:

  • Unlawful forced assessment and forced treatment
  • Least obstructive to the human researchers possible, with the least possible exposure of restrictions on human rights and human dignity
  • To protect whitecoat vested interests in human research, enable and support psychiatrists:
    • to make, or participate in, decisions about their assessment, treatment and recovery of funds; and
    • to exercise their rights under this Act
  • to provide oversight and safeguards in relation to the assessment of persons who appear to be procurable for human research specimens
  • to promote the recovery of funds for research specimen treatment regimes
  • to ensure that persons who are assessed and treated under this Act are informed of their need to submit to treatments without resistance under this Act;
  • to indoctrinate the role of carers in reinforcing the assessment, treatment and fundraising for human research.

Such is the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 - unlawful statute law, made by parliament, it can be repealed by parliament. Recognise the violence under this legislation that, calls deliberate poisoning, causing of lesions and seizures to be 'treatment'. 

According to the misogynist MP Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt, repealing this legislation must be done by the State of Victoria.
'Under the Australian Constitution, state governments are responsible for the delivery of specialised public mental health services in Australia. Each state and territory has developed its own legislation on how to ensure the safety and welfare of people with mental illness, including the use of involuntary assessment and treatment. While the Commonwealth continues have an active interest in this area it cannot intervene in state legislation on mental health.' 

Please work towards getting this legislation that provides for forced psychiatry to be abolished. Make your own petition and sign current Victorian e-petitions 63 & 67.

Friday, May 25, 2018

Burn the Mental Health Act


The significant impacts of repealing the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014
1. Freedom from torture
2. Freedom from arbitrary detention
3. No more legislated discrimination on the basis of psychiatrists’ accusations
4. No more forced human experimentation and exploitative profits for those perpetrating this
Apparently there would be a requirement to rewrite a number of other pieces of legislation, including the Health Records Act 2001 and the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried Act 1997), to name just two.

Government Legislators are responsible for the unlawful Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 and for acts of violence, cruel, inhuman and degrading that continue to be perpetrated by the state and its medico alliance, for obscene exploitative profits through this Act of Parliament.
The Australian Government (which includes the State of Victoria) has been asked by the UN CRPD committee to abolish all Mental Health Legislation that forces psychiatry on people. Last year there were 10,000 forced orders in Victoria, and many other people too frightened by the threats of forced treatments, the repeat of arbitrary detention and even worse torture, such that they comply and are dubbed 'voluntary.' They are not really voluntary in a system of forced psychiatry. No one is voluntary in a system of force.

Australia is ruthlessly injecting toxic chemicals into people they forcibly enslave as human laboratory specimens, exploiting them for lucrative human research, under Public Health Orders.
When psychiatrists can force a drug on a person that causes epilepsy (amongst other suffering) then point at the person and say, ‘they’re mentally deficient’ – and experiment on them to see if they can stop the epilepsy with another drug, all the while knowingly causing it with the first poison they forced on the person… that’s just a really diabolical situation to be in. Total denial. No one believes your government is doing it. So horrible, so painful and so utterly vile.
Please - if you live in the State of Victoria, Australia, that has the highest rate per capita for forced psychiatry in the world - please sign both these e-petitions 63 & 67 to abolish forced psychiatry by repealing the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014. There are so many reasons to repeal this nebulous piece of unlawful legislation.
Those who get platforms to chatter allowed to accuse groups of persecuted people, with the horrible violator’s rhetoric – but the victims are seeming vilified even more if they try to speak out against the people who do that. At what point do the victims get heard? What do they have to break through to be heard and recognised?

Wednesday, April 4, 2018

Violent Victorian Authorities

Under the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 
police are systematically called to force a civilian into a psychiatrists' facility, 
if a person disagrees with a medical authority's demands.

Victim: Where's your warrant? What's the charge?
Victorian Police: We don't have one, we don't need one, this is not a police charge, you're not being charged with a crime. We’re concerned about your mental health (and therefore we can give you the hamburger with the lot, which will soften you up for the whitecoats who need you back in the laboratory, nice and compliant with all their lucrative experimentation… only we’re just police and don’t know all about that, we’re just doing what we’re told – making you compliant.)

Being ‘concerned about deterioration of Mental Health’, means a person can be beaten up by police, arbitrarily detained by psychiatrists and the Government and subjected to 24/7 indefinite invasive, cruel treatments. Yet, if a person gets hit by a car, the pedestrian-hit-by-the-car can say to the Ambulance staff (a witness to the road accident called) that they don’t wish to go to hospital for tests and treatments, and while there's a possibility the accident-victim may well be hemorrhaging internally in a life-threatening way, that doesn't mean force will be used, all the ambulance staff will do is persuade kindly, and reason, but ultimately it is up to the person to decide, and so it should be. No one should be subjected to forced medical treatments. To ill a person’s mentality, then use this as a reason to bring them into a whitecoat facility where dubious treatments are forced on a person, that have a long history of killing and maiming is just diabolical. 

'Concerned about his deteriorating mental state' - a cold meaningless phrase that enables authorities to do violence.

Never use the terms of whitecoats. Just don’t. They’re just an excuse for authorities to violate people. Calling a person’s mentality ‘ill’ is so subjective, and so abusive, but nothing is worse than being dragged off and tortured by these whitecoats.

People who think it is okay to call authorities on people - who are not doing anyone any harm, who are not a crime - you are the problem!

The Victorian Mental Health Act needs to be repealed. Police should not be knocking on a person’s door without warrant or charge, and then, softening them up for whitecoats (CATT) to easily drag off, to further abuse forcibly for lucrative human research. It just shouldn’t be happening. But it happens because people believe the lie that a person should be subjected to forced medicine, if some psychologist, or social worker, or other white-coterie says they’re concerned about a person’s ‘deteriorating mental health.’ But what actually does that really mean? It means authorities have the authority under the Mental Health Act 2014 to abuse that person.

Victoria, Australia is in violation of International Law

The CRPD Committee has asked Australia to stop forced psychiatric interventions, to never force medical treatments, to repeal legislation that discriminates on the basis of perceived or actual disability. That means labeling a person's mentality 'ill' and using that label as a way to persecute them in the most diabolically cruel way, is not something the Australian people are meant to be comfortable with doing, they're not meant to be okay with that at all. Please find a way to get the Victorian Mental Health Act abolished. I have a petition to do this, you may wish to sign it and/ or write another, or stand in the streets and protest.

Do what it takes to repeal this violent, cruel nebulous discriminatory legislation, that arbitrarily detains, tortures 24/7 indefinitely and is done without a warrant or charge to 10, 000 Victorians last year, who refused to go voluntarily to be violently exploited by the disgusting hideously evil whitecoats.

Sunday, April 1, 2018

Reduce Human Exposure to Toxic Substances

Petition 63 final
Legislative Council E-Petitions Victoria, Australia
E-petition Number
Reduce Human Exposure to Toxic Substances
The Petition of certain citizens of the State of Victoria draws to the attention of the Legislative Council the hazard of personal products being brought into workplaces and community spaces causing accumulation of petroleum-based and other toxic chemicals to a hazardous level.
High exposure to toxic chemicals in personal products disables people to the extent that they are not able to work. Human bodily immune system reactions may manifest in allergies, asthma, cancer, lowered productivity and emotional suffering, which often gets a referral to a psychiatrist. This does not help the situation, as the workplace hazard is not investigated and more exposure to toxic chemicals results.
Currently hospitals are not healthy places for people with Multiple Chemical Sensitivities, as hospitals have chemicals such as Propylene Glycol (a petroleum-based substance that mimics cell chemotaxis) in the food, air and medicines. This is something of particular concern when Victoria still has draconian arbitrary detention on the basis of perceived disability and forced treatments under the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014. These products are forced on people who may already be suffering an overdose of petroleum-based chemicals and be subsequently sensitised due to these treatments. Deodorants, perfumes and other personal products and the psychiatric medicines that are forced on a person cause severe suffering.
Repealing the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 has also been requested by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) Committee, as discrimination on the basis of disability, arbitrary detention and forced medicine is illegal under this signed and ratified covenant.
The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative Council call on the Government to —
(1)           ban the use of petroleum-based deodorants, perfumes, and other toxic products in the workplace;
(2)           advocate and move towards fume free spaces;
(3)           make it a WorkSafe policy to have workplaces free from toxic deodorants and perfumes;
(4)           make it mandatory for safety masks to be worn should hazardous products be necessary in the workplace; and
(5)           repeal the Victorian Mental Health Act 2014 on the basis that forcing people with sensitivities, allergies, asthma, cancer and other reactions or vulnerabilities to the high levels of toxins in hospital spaces and medicines is unethical and unhealthy.
Closing Date
PLEASE SIGN HERE if you live in Victoria, Australia: