Eugenicists target what they term 'human stigmas' and made handshakes with government legislators in the mid 20th century, in order to profit from the violent exploitation that is Forced Human Experimentation.
For a public broadcaster, or anyone to say that they should not censor any debate conducted ‘in good faith’ is to not realise the in good faith rule is used to exploit millions of Australians every year forcibly for human experimentation in the guise of ‘care’ and ‘medicine.’ The term 'in good faith' gives medicos that violently exploit people for cruel, inhuman degrading medical experiments a status that is 'above the law', that is they cannot be charged with the crime of torture, assault or servitude, that they regularly inflict on people under Mental Health Legislation ( in Australia each state/ territory has a Mental Health Act that likely can only be repealed should a Federal Human Rights Act come about to over-turn these nebulous, exploitative, cruel Mental Health Acts.)
It’s not okay, however, to put people into this Sectioned (under the Mental Health Act) category anymore on the basis of the being same-sex attracted, though there are still attempts from the eugenicists/ psychiatrists/ psychologists to do just that. That said, while there is still a group of people being targeted for victimisation under statute law, there is no real equality before the law, not for anyone. Government Eugenics laws for 'protection' have even arbitrarily detained journalist and human rights defender Jill Jolliffe, who can articulate her rights very clearly. Eugenicists have really, really worn out that word 'protection' in Australia, what with the repealed Protectionist Act, but it doesn't make the public wise to the eugenics antics, of those the public see as 'elite scientists' chattering the psychobabble illogical of eugenics.
okay, here's a game...
FILL IN THE BLANKS OF THIS EUGENICS RHETORIC