Tuesday, December 20, 2016

208 years of Forced Human Experimentation

Insulin Shock, was considered to be a 'cure' from the 1920s until the 1960s, when it was replaced by neuroleptic chemical lobotomies. It wasn't a cure, or help (like most of psychiatry's abuses on humans) it killed many, caused brain-damage, and none of those people who survived the suffering of it were compensated, or allowed to speak to mainstream media to gain validation for being forced into these horrible human experiments.

A survivor of Insulin Shock writes,'My insulin-induced hunger or forced starvation was intense and excruciatingly painful. It went to the core of my very being. There are two types of insulin shock – coma and subcoma, I got the latter. However, I once went into a coma which Dr. Sharpe and other psychiatrists never warned me about, and which is carefully omitted on my medical chart.'

Society must start to consider how insulin is NOW being used by medicos to murder people. That this FORCED human experimentation, has yielded data on how to kill people, that medicos have access to the precise details of. Here's some articles that expose those murdering medicos:

It is understood that a certain dose of Clozapine will kill people, just as insulin will. Clozapine is being currently experimented on, in Australia, over and above other kinds of drugs in psychiatry's array of chemicals, even though it is an old drug, that prior to 2014, was forced, or coerced on people (under duress) as a 'last resort', because it was highly dangerous and needed to be monitored, and often killed people. There is most likely a vested interest in finding out whether it is reliable to kill people, or perhaps being used for trials to do with lowing the white blood-cell count. Companies that do Human Research into blood disorders, may be beneficiaries of people who are enslaved into this human experimentation. These companies may well even pay for the data. If that is not going on, then, there's a lot of extra monitoring of people's blood and heart etc... because they've been placed on this drug, often with other drugs, to see the effects. And, in Australia a $60 billion dollar tax bill per year, to pay for this unwanted Forced Human Experimentation, that causes 24/7 indefinite torture to millions of Australians every year.

'A senior psychiatric practitioner made the verbatim statement that, Quote: “Eastern Health (Upton House) has no other effective treatment options other than ECT, as the family refuses to consider clozapine. We believe his (Garth’s) current medication regime is ineffective”. Unquote. Such an admission in our view, "we say" contravenes both agreed medical conventions on this very high-risk forced medication approach.' http://www.glennfloyd.org/garth.pdf

This is obviously a grant to look at the effects of Clozapine on diabetes and heart conditions. (MECTA that make ECT machines, linked to Pfizer via an umbrella pharmaceutical company, most likely also involved. Although ECT is often just used as a threat that is carried through to get a person to agree to whatever the psychiatrist wants).

There are probably experiments perhaps done on changing person's blood-type, but I'm not sure why this would be immediately financed or of interest to those investing in it. I'm just aware that mine changed, and there is, if you look it up a medical understanding on how a disease like rubella, or other stressors can change a person's blood-type.

Psychiatric drugs, particularly the neuroleptics, are one of the most horrendous tortures in the world, shutting down a person's ability to self-advocate, making a person an invalid, making a person in constant pain, as well as inarticulate.

NB: The approvals covered access to medical records without patient consent

Look further at this document here:

208 years of Forced Human Experimentation, that is the history of psychiatry, and it hasn't stopped, it has increased. It is time for Investigative Journalists to start really looking into what the psychiatric regime is doing in Australia and other countries in the world. Robert Whitaker (Investigative Journalist, USA) has been marvellous in being able to understand and listen to people who have suffered psychiatry, and get their point of view heard. However, it is rare in Australia, for journalists to take our side, and in speaking to journalists hoping they are on our side, we often find that they have vested interests and they end up writing for those who perpetrate the wrongs on us, distorting and misquoting us. It is horrible, as psychsurvivors to constantly see the perpetrators of forced human experimentation, being allowed their point-of-view, because of the greed of journalists and publications.

I'm thinking the vested interest for most journalists in their pitching of a story to magazines, TV, or radio, is advertising, and while psychiatric drugs are not directly advertised on TV, the company that makes the popular toothpaste advertisement, the shampoo, the skin cream... is the same company that makes the neuroleptics forced on Australian Citizens against their will.

Then, there are the donations to the political parties... and that means ABC will be put under some kind of pressure, probably more than commercial media, no matter what party gets in. To do an expose on government crimes against citizens, is one thing, to expose their sponsors, another.